PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLJH vs. DBJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLJH vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLJH vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
9.29%25.26%25.89%36.02%-2.75%12.68%10.65%20.34%-14.66%1.26%
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
9.63%29.51%25.53%36.21%-4.19%13.04%10.53%20.87%-14.82%1.14%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FLJH having a 9.29% return and DBJP slightly higher at 9.63%.


FLJH

1D
2.72%
1M
-2.83%
YTD
9.29%
6M
17.51%
1Y
40.53%
3Y*
28.77%
5Y*
18.48%
10Y*

DBJP

1D
2.73%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
9.63%
6M
22.76%
1Y
45.69%
3Y*
29.91%
5Y*
19.11%
10Y*
15.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLJH vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLJH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DBJP's 0.46% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLJH vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLJH
FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

DBJP
DBJP Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLJH vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLJHDBJPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

1.94

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.43

2.62

-0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

3.69

-0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.34

14.11

-1.77

FLJH vs. DBJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJH Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the DBJP Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJH and DBJP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLJHDBJPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

1.94

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

1.02

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.65

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between FLJH and DBJP is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FLJH vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison

FLJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than DBJP's 2.57% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
3.57%3.90%5.06%25.59%26.67%1.29%0.00%0.00%5.92%0.10%0.00%0.00%
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
2.57%2.81%2.80%5.21%0.80%2.30%2.53%2.56%3.87%2.07%1.13%5.95%

Drawdowns

FLJH vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJH drawdown since its inception was -31.51%, roughly equal to the maximum DBJP drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJH and DBJP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLJHDBJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.51%

-31.30%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.83%

-12.11%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-21.50%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.01%

-4.71%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-7.35%

+1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

3.16%

+0.03%

Volatility

FLJH vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) have volatilities of 7.76% and 7.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLJHDBJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

7.74%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.50%

14.81%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.00%

23.64%

-0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.50%

18.88%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.90%

19.78%

+0.12%