PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYV vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYV vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYV achieves a 8.25% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYV has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 12.08%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.


SPYV

1D
0.69%
1M
1.81%
YTD
8.25%
6M
8.02%
1Y
20.65%
3Y*
15.13%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
12.08%

VGT

1D
0.58%
1M
2.90%
YTD
24.03%
6M
24.13%
1Y
47.99%
3Y*
29.84%
5Y*
20.35%
10Y*
25.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYV vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
8.25%13.18%12.24%22.20%-5.28%24.91%1.38%31.70%-9.01%15.40%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
24.03%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYV and VGT is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.70

The correlation between SPYV and VGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPYV vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYV
VGT

Technology

21.5%
98.5%

Financial Services

14.5%
0.5%

Healthcare

11.6%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
0.1%

Industrials

10.8%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

9.1%

-

Energy

7.1%
0.3%

Utilities

4.3%

-

Basic Materials

3.4%
0.0%

Real Estate

3.3%

-

Communication Services

3.2%
0.5%

Technology

SPYV
21.5%
VGT
98.5%

Financial Services

SPYV
14.5%
VGT
0.5%

Healthcare

SPYV
11.6%
VGT
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYV
11.2%
VGT
0.1%

Industrials

SPYV
10.8%
VGT
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

SPYV
9.1%
VGT

-

Energy

SPYV
7.1%
VGT
0.3%

Utilities

SPYV
4.3%
VGT

-

Basic Materials

SPYV
3.4%
VGT
0.0%

Real Estate

SPYV
3.3%
VGT

-

Communication Services

SPYV
3.2%
VGT
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYV vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYV vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYVVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.36

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

2.94

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.73

9.11

+3.62

SPYV vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYV Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYV and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYV vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYV drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYV and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYVVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.45%

-54.63%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.22%

-16.40%

+10.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

-27.23%

+9.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.89%

-35.07%

+17.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.89%

-35.07%

-1.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-7.18%

+7.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.71%

-7.95%

-0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

5.28%

-3.65%

Volatility

SPYV vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) is 2.70%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 10.00%. This indicates that SPYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYVVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

10.00%

-7.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.26%

18.00%

-10.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.97%

22.00%

-12.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.42%

25.40%

-10.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

24.72%

-7.78%

SPYV vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYV vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

SPYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.68%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYV and VGT have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to SPYV (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYV dropped -58.45% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.19% vs 12.08% for SPYV. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 12.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.

SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

SPYV is categorized as S&P 500, while VGT is Technology Equities. SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYV and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYV and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer