SPYV vs. TMHC
SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index, while TMHC (Taylor Morrison Home Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SPYV returned 12.08%/yr vs 17.21%/yr for TMHC. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SPYV vs. TMHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYV achieves a 8.25% return, which is significantly lower than TMHC's 22.13% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYV has underperformed TMHC with an annualized return of 12.08%, while TMHC has yielded a comparatively higher 17.21% annualized return.
SPYV
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 8.25%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
TMHC
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 26.25%
- YTD
- 22.13%
- 6M
- 14.86%
- 1Y
- 23.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.27%
- 5Y*
- 20.87%
- 10Y*
- 17.21%
SPYV vs. TMHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 8.25% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
TMHC Taylor Morrison Home Corporation | 22.13% | -3.82% | 14.73% | 75.78% | -13.19% | 36.30% | 17.34% | 37.48% | -35.02% | 27.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYV and TMHC is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2013 | 0.51 |
The correlation between SPYV and TMHC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYV vs. TMHC — Risk / Return Rank
SPYV
TMHC
SPYV vs. TMHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYV | TMHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.15 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 0.89 | +2.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.73 | 1.66 | +11.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYV vs. TMHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYV drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, smaller than the maximum TMHC drawdown of -75.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYV and TMHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYV | TMHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.45% | -75.18% | +16.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.22% | -23.80% | +17.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.54% | -27.90% | +10.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.89% | -40.84% | +22.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.89% | -75.18% | +38.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -3.88% | +3.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.71% | -20.26% | +11.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 12.79% | -11.16% |
Volatility
SPYV vs. TMHC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) is 2.70%, while Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) has a volatility of 21.03%. This indicates that SPYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYV | TMHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 21.03% | -18.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.26% | 29.55% | -22.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.97% | 39.09% | -29.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 37.83% | -23.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 44.77% | -27.83% |
Dividends
SPYV vs. TMHC - Dividend Comparison
SPYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, while TMHC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.68% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
TMHC Taylor Morrison Home Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYV and TMHC have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMHC has higher volatility (21.03%) compared to SPYV (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYV dropped -58.45% vs TMHC's -75.18%.
SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYV and TMHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer