SPYV vs. TLT
SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYV returned 11.83%/yr vs -1.85%/yr for TLT. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. SPYV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
SPYV vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYV achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -1.08% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYV has outperformed TLT with an annualized return of 11.83%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.85% annualized return.
SPYV
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- 7.88%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 10.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
TLT
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- -1.08%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- 3.67%
- 3Y*
- -2.05%
- 5Y*
- -6.70%
- 10Y*
- -1.85%
SPYV vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 6.98% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -1.08% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | -4.60% | 18.15% | 14.12% | -1.61% | 9.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYV and TLT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2002 | -0.26 |
The correlation between SPYV and TLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYV vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
SPYV
TLT
SPYV vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYV | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.07 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 0.49 | +2.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.39 | 1.19 | +11.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYV | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 0.38 | +1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | -0.42 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | -0.12 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.25 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
SPYV vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYV drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, which is greater than TLT's maximum drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYV and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYV | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.45% | -48.35% | -10.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.22% | -7.58% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.54% | -19.18% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.89% | -43.70% | +25.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.89% | -48.35% | +11.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -40.92% | +39.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.71% | -13.83% | +5.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 3.08% | -1.46% |
Volatility
SPYV vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) is 2.28%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that SPYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYV | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.28% | 2.65% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.18% | 6.51% | +0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.91% | 9.60% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 15.85% | -1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 14.91% | +2.04% |
SPYV vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYV vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
SPYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than TLT's 4.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.70% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.63% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYV and TLT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLT has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to SPYV (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYV dropped -58.45% vs TLT's -48.35%.
On 10-year performance, SPYV leads with 11.83% vs -1.85% for TLT. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 11.83% return vs -1.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TLT.
TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 1.70% for SPYV.
SPYV is categorized as S&P 500, while TLT is Government Bonds. SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYV and 0.15% for TLT.
SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYV and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer