PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYV vs. SLYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYV vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYV achieves a 8.25% return, which is significantly lower than SLYV's 19.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYV has outperformed SLYV with an annualized return of 12.08%, while SLYV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.65% annualized return.


SPYV

1D
0.69%
1M
1.59%
YTD
8.25%
6M
8.02%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
15.13%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
12.08%

SLYV

1D
1.09%
1M
6.39%
YTD
19.47%
6M
16.63%
1Y
41.92%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*
10.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYV vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
8.25%13.18%12.24%22.20%-5.28%24.91%1.38%31.70%-9.01%15.40%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
19.47%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYV and SLYV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000

0.81

The correlation between SPYV and SLYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYV vs. SLYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYV
SLYV

Technology

22.4%
13.4%

Financial Services

14.5%
19.5%

Healthcare

11.5%
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
15.4%

Industrials

10.5%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.9%
3.8%

Energy

7.0%
7.0%

Utilities

4.3%
2.1%

Real Estate

3.4%
8.6%

Basic Materials

3.3%
6.9%

Communication Services

3.2%
4.4%

Technology

SPYV
22.4%
SLYV
13.4%

Financial Services

SPYV
14.5%
SLYV
19.5%

Healthcare

SPYV
11.5%
SLYV
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYV
11.1%
SLYV
15.4%

Industrials

SPYV
10.5%
SLYV
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPYV
8.9%
SLYV
3.8%

Energy

SPYV
7.0%
SLYV
7.0%

Utilities

SPYV
4.3%
SLYV
2.1%

Real Estate

SPYV
3.4%
SLYV
8.6%

Basic Materials

SPYV
3.3%
SLYV
6.9%

Communication Services

SPYV
3.2%
SLYV
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYV vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYV vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYVSLYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

4.20

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.73

13.96

-1.23

SPYV vs. SLYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYV Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the SLYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYV and SLYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYV vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYV drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, roughly equal to the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYV and SLYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYVSLYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.45%

-61.15%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.22%

-9.36%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

-28.68%

+11.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.89%

-28.68%

+10.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.89%

-47.73%

+10.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

0.00%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.71%

-8.93%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

2.82%

-1.19%

Volatility

SPYV vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) is 2.70%, while SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that SPYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYVSLYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

4.81%

-2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.26%

11.59%

-4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.97%

18.31%

-8.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.42%

21.97%

-7.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

23.96%

-7.02%

SPYV vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYV vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison

SPYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than SLYV's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
1.75%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.68%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYV and SLYV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLYV has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to SPYV (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYV dropped -58.45% vs SLYV's -61.15%.

On 10-year performance, SPYV leads with 12.08% vs 10.65% for SLYV. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 12.08% return vs 10.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYV.

SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.68% for SPYV.

SPYV is categorized as S&P 500, while SLYV is Small Cap Value Equities. SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYV and 0.15% for SLYV.

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYV and SLYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer