SPYM vs. BKLC
SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) and BKLC (BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while BKLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPYM returned 13.13%/yr vs 13.37%/yr for BKLC. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPYM charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for BKLC.
Performance
SPYM vs. BKLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPYM having a 8.21% return and BKLC slightly higher at 8.23%.
SPYM
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 23.73%
- 3Y*
- 20.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
BKLC
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 8.23%
- 6M
- 7.30%
- 1Y
- 23.79%
- 3Y*
- 21.56%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYM vs. BKLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 8.21% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 38.26% |
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF | 8.23% | 18.06% | 25.56% | 30.88% | -20.52% | 27.41% | 37.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYM and BKLC is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2020 | 0.98 |
The correlation between SPYM and BKLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPYM vs. BKLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYM
BKLC
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPYM
BKLC
Financial Services
SPYM
BKLC
Communication Services
SPYM
BKLC
Consumer Cyclical
SPYM
BKLC
Healthcare
SPYM
BKLC
Industrials
SPYM
BKLC
Consumer Defensive
SPYM
BKLC
Energy
SPYM
BKLC
Utilities
SPYM
BKLC
Real Estate
SPYM
BKLC
Basic Materials
SPYM
BKLC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYM vs. BKLC — Risk / Return Rank
SPYM
BKLC
SPYM vs. BKLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYM | BKLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 2.62 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.98 | 11.54 | +0.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYM vs. BKLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYM drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, which is greater than BKLC's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM and BKLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYM | BKLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.46% | -26.14% | -28.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -9.10% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.72% | -19.05% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.48% | -26.14% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.14% | -3.16% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.14% | -5.24% | -1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 2.07% | -0.08% |
Volatility
SPYM vs. BKLC - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) have volatilities of 4.83% and 5.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYM | BKLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.83% | 5.04% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.83% | 10.09% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.46% | 12.83% | -0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 17.28% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 17.47% | +0.56% |
SPYM vs. BKLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYM has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is higher than BKLC's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYM vs. BKLC - Dividend Comparison
SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than BKLC's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.04% | 1.05% | 1.22% | 1.35% | 1.64% | 1.10% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.30% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, SPYM and BKLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BKLC has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to SPYM (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYM dropped -54.46% vs BKLC's -26.14%.
On 5-year performance, BKLC leads with 13.37% vs 13.13% for SPYM. On fees, BKLC is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BKLC has performed better with a 13.37% return vs 13.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKLC is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.02% for SPYM.
SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 1.04% for BKLC.
SPYM is categorized as S&P 500, while BKLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index, while BKLC tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for SPYM and 0.00% for BKLC.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYM and BKLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer