PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYG vs. SWLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYG vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's 8.61% return.


SPYG

1D
-0.98%
1M
7.38%
YTD
13.75%
6M
13.57%
1Y
33.95%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
16.07%
10Y*
18.20%

SWLGX

1D
-0.37%
1M
7.15%
YTD
8.61%
6M
8.00%
1Y
27.46%
3Y*
25.54%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYG vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.75%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%-0.69%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
8.61%18.55%33.30%42.67%-29.17%27.55%38.43%36.30%-1.59%-0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYG and SWLGX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017

0.98

The correlation between SPYG and SWLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYG vs. SWLGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYG
SWLGX

Technology

51.9%
51.4%

Communication Services

16.8%
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
13.2%

Financial Services

8.5%
5.4%

Healthcare

5.8%
7.1%

Industrials

5.0%
5.7%

Utilities

1.2%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
2.7%

Real Estate

0.6%
0.4%

Basic Materials

0.3%
0.3%

Energy

0.1%
0.4%

Technology

SPYG
51.9%
SWLGX
51.4%

Communication Services

SPYG
16.8%
SWLGX
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYG
8.9%
SWLGX
13.2%

Financial Services

SPYG
8.5%
SWLGX
5.4%

Healthcare

SPYG
5.8%
SWLGX
7.1%

Industrials

SPYG
5.0%
SWLGX
5.7%

Utilities

SPYG
1.2%
SWLGX
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

SPYG
1.0%
SWLGX
2.7%

Real Estate

SPYG
0.6%
SWLGX
0.4%

Basic Materials

SPYG
0.3%
SWLGX
0.3%

Energy

SPYG
0.1%
SWLGX
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYG vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SWLGX
SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYG vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYGSWLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.32

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

1.76

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.25

5.92

+4.34

SPYG vs. SWLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYG Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the SWLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYG and SWLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYGSWLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.85

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.75

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.80

-0.45

Drawdowns

SPYG vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and SWLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYGSWLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.63%

-32.69%

-34.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-16.16%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

-23.30%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

-32.69%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-0.37%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.33%

-7.05%

-17.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

4.80%

-1.48%

Volatility

SPYG vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 3.30%. This indicates that SPYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYGSWLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

3.30%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.46%

11.59%

+0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

15.40%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.17%

21.49%

-0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.64%

22.68%

-2.04%

SPYG vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYG vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison

SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, more than SWLGX's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.47%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
0.42%0.46%0.52%0.67%0.93%1.76%0.67%0.96%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SPYG and SWLGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPYG has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to SWLGX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYG and SWLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer