PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYG vs. SPEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYG vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than SPEM's 11.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYG has outperformed SPEM with an annualized return of 17.91%, while SPEM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.63% annualized return.


SPYG

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.60%
1Y
29.17%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
14.92%
10Y*
17.91%

SPEM

1D
0.87%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
11.32%
6M
13.11%
1Y
27.73%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
5.60%
10Y*
9.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYG vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
9.70%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
11.32%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%19.69%-13.26%34.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYG and SPEM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2007

0.71

The correlation between SPYG and SPEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (3 years) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPYG vs. SPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYG
SPEM

Technology

52.2%
28.2%

Communication Services

16.7%
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
10.4%

Financial Services

8.3%
20.2%

Healthcare

5.8%
4.0%

Industrials

5.0%
8.5%

Utilities

1.1%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
3.9%

Real Estate

0.5%
1.9%

Basic Materials

0.3%
8.2%

Energy

0.1%
4.7%

Technology

SPYG
52.2%
SPEM
28.2%

Communication Services

SPYG
16.7%
SPEM
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYG
8.9%
SPEM
10.4%

Financial Services

SPYG
8.3%
SPEM
20.2%

Healthcare

SPYG
5.8%
SPEM
4.0%

Industrials

SPYG
5.0%
SPEM
8.5%

Utilities

SPYG
1.1%
SPEM
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPYG
1.0%
SPEM
3.9%

Real Estate

SPYG
0.5%
SPEM
1.9%

Basic Materials

SPYG
0.3%
SPEM
8.2%

Energy

SPYG
0.1%
SPEM
4.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYG vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYG vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYGSPEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.28

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.08

8.16

-0.08

SPYG vs. SPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the SPEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYG and SPEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYG vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, roughly equal to the maximum SPEM drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and SPEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYGSPEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.63%

-64.41%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-11.36%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

-17.62%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

-31.75%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

-36.06%

+3.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

-2.40%

-2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.30%

-14.73%

-9.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

3.17%

+0.25%

Volatility

SPYG vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) is 6.33%, while SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that SPYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYGSPEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

6.87%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.48%

14.21%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.81%

16.67%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.27%

17.26%

+4.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.70%

18.83%

+1.87%

SPYG vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SPEM's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYG vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison

SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than SPEM's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
2.49%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.48%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYG and SPEM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPEM has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to SPYG (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs SPEM's -64.41%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 17.91% vs 9.63% for SPEM. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 17.91% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for SPEM.

SPEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.48% for SPYG.

SPYG is categorized as S&P 500, while SPEM is Emerging Markets Equities. SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while SPEM tracks S&P Emerging Markets BMI. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.11% for SPEM.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYG and SPEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer