SPEM vs. EEM
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM).
SPEM and EEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPEM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging Markets BMI. It was launched on Mar 19, 2007. EEM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. It was launched on Apr 11, 2003. Both SPEM and EEM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SPEM vs. EEM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SPEM vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 0.21% | 25.63% | 11.40% | 10.51% | -17.90% | 1.51% | 14.55% | 19.69% | -13.26% | 34.82% |
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.80% | 33.98% | 6.49% | 8.95% | -20.56% | -3.63% | 17.02% | 18.22% | -15.31% | 37.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPEM achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 3.80% return. Over the past 10 years, SPEM has outperformed EEM with an annualized return of 8.16%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively lower 7.58% annualized return.
SPEM
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -7.13%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 22.70%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.16%
EEM
- 1D
- 3.73%
- 1M
- -9.25%
- YTD
- 3.80%
- 6M
- 7.87%
- 1Y
- 33.09%
- 3Y*
- 15.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 7.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPEM vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPEM has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SPEM vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank
SPEM
EEM
SPEM vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPEM | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.28 | 1.64 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 2.23 | -0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.33 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 2.43 | -0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.01 | 9.41 | -2.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPEM | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 1.64 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.19 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.37 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.35 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between SPEM and EEM is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SPEM vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison
SPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than EEM's 2.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 2.77% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 3.38% | 3.14% | 1.92% | 2.94% | 2.34% | 1.12% | 1.51% | 2.40% |
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.14% | 2.22% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.49% |
Drawdowns
SPEM vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPEM drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, roughly equal to the maximum EEM drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEM and EEM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPEM | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.41% | -66.43% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.35% | -13.52% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.94% | -37.82% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.06% | -39.82% | +3.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.56% | -10.30% | +1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -16.12% | +1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 3.49% | -0.29% |
Volatility
SPEM vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) is 8.25%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a volatility of 10.70%. This indicates that SPEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SPEM | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.25% | 10.70% | -2.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.23% | 15.12% | -2.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.79% | 20.23% | -2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 18.43% | -1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 20.32% | -1.56% |