PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPEM vs. VWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPEM vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPEM having a 9.89% return and VWO slightly lower at 9.41%. Over the past 10 years, SPEM has outperformed VWO with an annualized return of 8.53%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.86% annualized return.


SPEM

1D
0.77%
1M
-0.37%
6M
4.56%
YTD
9.89%
1Y
22.14%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
6.70%
10Y*
8.53%
ALL TIME*
5.54%

VWO

1D
0.96%
1M
-0.49%
6M
4.16%
YTD
9.41%
1Y
21.69%
3Y*
14.84%
5Y*
6.08%
10Y*
7.86%
ALL TIME*
6.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$90.49M$105.53M$120.92M
$386.61M$469.40M$499.89M

SPEM vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
9.89%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%19.69%-13.26%34.82%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
9.41%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%

Correlation

The correlation between SPEM and VWO is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2007

0.96

The correlation between SPEM and VWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPEM vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPEM
VWO

Technology

32.7%
34.2%

Financial Services

19.9%
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
9.1%

Industrials

8.3%
7.9%

Basic Materials

7.7%
7.2%

Communication Services

6.6%
6.6%

Healthcare

3.9%
3.7%

Energy

3.8%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
3.3%

Utilities

2.7%
2.8%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.0%

Technology

SPEM
32.7%
VWO
34.2%

Financial Services

SPEM
19.9%
VWO
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SPEM
8.9%
VWO
9.1%

Industrials

SPEM
8.3%
VWO
7.9%

Basic Materials

SPEM
7.7%
VWO
7.2%

Communication Services

SPEM
6.6%
VWO
6.6%

Healthcare

SPEM
3.9%
VWO
3.7%

Energy

SPEM
3.8%
VWO
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPEM
3.7%
VWO
3.3%

Utilities

SPEM
2.7%
VWO
2.8%

Real Estate

SPEM
1.8%
VWO
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPEM vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPEM vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPEMVWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.22

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

1.89

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.31

6.16

+0.15

SPEM vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPEM and VWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPEM vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPEM drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, roughly equal to the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEM and VWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPEMVWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.41%

-67.68%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-11.17%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

-17.37%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.03%

-30.88%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.06%

-36.39%

+0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.14%

-4.07%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.66%

-15.73%

+1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

3.43%

0.00%

Volatility

SPEM vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) have volatilities of 5.72% and 5.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPEMVWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.72%

5.58%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.43%

15.22%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

17.58%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

17.56%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.80%

19.17%

-0.37%

SPEM vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPEM has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPEM vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

SPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than VWO's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
2.55%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.35%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, SPEM and VWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPEM has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to VWO (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPEM dropped -64.41% vs VWO's -67.68%.

On 10-year performance, SPEM leads with 8.53% vs 7.86% for VWO. On fees, SPEM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 5.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPEM has performed better with a 8.53% return vs 7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPEM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VWO.

SPEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 2.35% for VWO.

SPEM tracks S&P Emerging BMI Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SPEM and 0.08% for VWO.

SPEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPEM and VWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer