SPYG vs. SH
SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) and SH (ProShares Short S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index, while SH is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYG returned 17.91%/yr vs -12.83%/yr for SH. At a correlation of -0.94, they often move in opposite directions. SPYG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SH.
Performance
SPYG vs. SH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than SH's -6.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYG has outperformed SH with an annualized return of 17.91%, while SH has yielded a comparatively lower -12.83% annualized return.
SPYG
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 29.17%
- 3Y*
- 25.85%
- 5Y*
- 14.92%
- 10Y*
- 17.91%
SH
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- -6.39%
- 6M
- -6.43%
- 1Y
- -15.90%
- 3Y*
- -11.96%
- 5Y*
- -8.68%
- 10Y*
- -12.83%
SPYG vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 9.70% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -6.39% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | 18.98% | -24.21% | -25.09% | -22.12% | 4.93% | -17.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYG and SH is -0.93, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006 | -0.94 |
The correlation between SPYG and SH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.95 to -0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPYG vs. SH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYG
SH
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
SPYG
SH
-
Communication Services
SPYG
SH
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPYG
SH
-
Financial Services
SPYG
SH
Healthcare
SPYG
SH
-
Industrials
SPYG
SH
-
Utilities
SPYG
SH
-
Consumer Defensive
SPYG
SH
-
Real Estate
SPYG
SH
-
Basic Materials
SPYG
SH
-
Energy
SPYG
SH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYG vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank
SPYG
SH
SPYG vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYG | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.81 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | -0.82 | +2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | -1.47 | +9.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYG vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, smaller than the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and SH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYG | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.63% | -94.66% | +27.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.76% | -18.16% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.14% | -38.82% | +16.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.67% | -44.53% | +11.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.67% | -76.12% | +43.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -94.53% | +89.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.30% | -67.75% | +43.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 10.13% | -6.71% |
Volatility
SPYG vs. SH - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 4.33%. This indicates that SPYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYG | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 4.33% | +2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 9.59% | +3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.81% | 12.28% | +4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 16.91% | +4.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 18.04% | +2.66% |
SPYG vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SH's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYG vs. SH - Dividend Comparison
SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than SH's 4.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.43% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.48% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYG and SH have a correlation of -0.93, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYG has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to SH (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs SH's -94.66%.
On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 17.91% vs -12.83% for SH. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 17.91% return vs -12.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SH.
SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 0.48% for SPYG.
SPYG is categorized as S&P 500, while SH is Inverse Equities. SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while SH tracks S&P 500 (-100%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.90% for SH.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYG and SH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer