SH vs. SCHD
SH (ProShares Short S&P500) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SH is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 (-100%), while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SH returned -12.83%/yr vs 12.59%/yr for SCHD. At a correlation of -0.82, they often move in opposite directions. SH charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
SH vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SH achieves a -6.30% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SH has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of -12.83%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.
SH
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- -6.30%
- 6M
- -7.79%
- 1Y
- -15.72%
- 3Y*
- -11.69%
- 5Y*
- -8.99%
- 10Y*
- -12.83%
SCHD
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 17.39%
- 6M
- 16.67%
- 1Y
- 24.12%
- 3Y*
- 13.46%
- 5Y*
- 9.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
SH vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -6.30% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | 18.98% | -24.21% | -25.09% | -22.12% | 4.93% | -17.36% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.39% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SH and SCHD is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | -0.82 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SH and SCHD has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.82 to -0.35, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
SH vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SH
SCHD
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SH
SCHD
Basic Materials
SH
-
SCHD
Communication Services
SH
-
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
SH
-
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
SH
-
SCHD
Energy
SH
-
SCHD
Healthcare
SH
-
SCHD
Industrials
SH
-
SCHD
Real Estate
SH
-
SCHD
-
Technology
SH
-
SCHD
Utilities
SH
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SH vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
SH
SCHD
SH vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SH | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.39 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 5.25 | -6.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | 12.86 | -14.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SH vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SH drawdown since its inception was -94.66%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SH and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SH | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.66% | -33.37% | -61.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.16% | -4.61% | -13.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.82% | -16.13% | -22.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.53% | -16.85% | -27.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.12% | -33.37% | -42.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.52% | -2.74% | -91.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.77% | -3.31% | -64.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.29% | 1.88% | +8.41% |
Volatility
SH vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.58%. This indicates that SH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SH | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | 3.58% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | 7.83% | +1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.38% | 11.10% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 14.40% | +2.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 16.73% | +1.32% |
SH vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SH has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
SH vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than SCHD's 3.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.31% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.42% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SH and SCHD have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SH has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SH dropped -94.66% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.59% vs -12.83% for SH. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.59% return vs -12.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SH.
SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.42%, compared with 3.31% for SCHD.
SH is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. SH tracks S&P 500 (-100%), while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SH and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SH and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer