SH vs. SQQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ).
SH and SQQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SH is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 (-100%). It was launched on Jun 19, 2006. SQQQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). It was launched on Feb 9, 2010. Both SH and SQQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SH or SQQQ.
Key characteristics
| SH | SQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.71% | -7.77% |
| 1Y Return | -12.29% | -56.17% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -5.74% | -37.71% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -12.75% | -56.42% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -11.97% | -52.18% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.97 | -1.13 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.56% | 48.70% |
| Max Drawdown | -93.02% | -100.00% |
| Current Drawdown | -92.64% | -100.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SH and SQQQ is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SH vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SH achieves a -2.71% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -7.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SH has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of -11.97%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -52.18% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SH vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SH has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SH vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SH vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, less than SQQQ's 8.49% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 5.75% | 5.37% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 8.49% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Drawdowns
SH vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SH drawdown since its inception was -93.02%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SH and SQQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SH vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) is 3.81%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 16.15%. This indicates that SH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.