SH vs. SQQQ
SH (ProShares Short S&P500) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - SH is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-100% daily), while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SH returned -12.31%/yr vs -54.17%/yr for SQQQ. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SH charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.
Performance
SH vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SH achieves a -5.72% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -30.46% return. Over the past 10 years, SH has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of -12.31%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -54.17% annualized return.
SH
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- 6M
- -4.58%
- YTD
- -5.72%
- 1Y
- -10.08%
- 3Y*
- -10.63%
- 5Y*
- -7.83%
- 10Y*
- -12.31%
- ALL TIME*
- -11.25%
SQQQ
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 12.59%
- 6M
- -24.78%
- YTD
- -30.46%
- 1Y
- -45.25%
- 3Y*
- -48.69%
- 5Y*
- -43.59%
- 10Y*
- -54.17%
- ALL TIME*
- -52.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $243.46M | $212.87M | $298.74M | |
| $2.18B | $2.18B | $2.65B |
SH vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -5.72% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | 18.98% | -24.21% | -25.09% | -22.12% | 4.93% | -17.36% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -30.46% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SH and SQQQ is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.90 |
The correlation between SH and SQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
SH vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SH
SQQQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SH
SQQQ
Basic Materials
SH
-
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
SH
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
SH
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
SH
-
SQQQ
-
Energy
SH
-
SQQQ
-
Healthcare
SH
-
SQQQ
-
Industrials
SH
-
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
SH
-
SQQQ
-
Technology
SH
-
SQQQ
-
Utilities
SH
-
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SH vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SH
SQQQ
SH vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SH | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | -0.74 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | -1.31 | +0.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SH vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SH drawdown since its inception was -94.66%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SH and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SH | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.66% | -100.00% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.06% | -61.03% | +44.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.82% | -92.51% | +53.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.53% | -97.27% | +52.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.80% | -99.97% | +25.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.49% | -100.00% | +5.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.90% | -92.77% | +24.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.87% | 34.65% | -25.78% |
Volatility
SH vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) is 3.13%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 19.84%. This indicates that SH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SH | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 19.84% | -16.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.83% | 46.68% | -36.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.63% | 56.79% | -44.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 68.01% | -51.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 66.66% | -48.65% |
SH vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SH has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SH vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than SQQQ's 8.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.15% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 8.59% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SH and SQQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SQQQ has higher volatility (19.84%) compared to SH (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SH dropped -94.66% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, SH leads with -12.31% vs -54.17% for SQQQ. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 3.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SH has performed better with a -12.31% return vs -54.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SH is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 8.59%, compared with 4.15% for SH.
SH is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SH tracks S&P 500 Index (-100% daily), while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.89% for SH and 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.80 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SH and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer