SPYG vs. MTUM
SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYG returned 17.91%/yr vs 17.15%/yr for MTUM. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPYG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
SPYG vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 29.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPYG having a 17.91% annualized return and MTUM not far behind at 17.15%.
SPYG
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 29.17%
- 3Y*
- 25.85%
- 5Y*
- 14.92%
- 10Y*
- 17.91%
MTUM
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 29.72%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 42.02%
- 3Y*
- 33.16%
- 5Y*
- 14.96%
- 10Y*
- 17.15%
SPYG vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 9.70% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 29.72% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 29.86% | 27.25% | -1.67% | 37.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYG and MTUM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SPYG and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPYG vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYG
MTUM
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
SPYG
MTUM
Communication Services
SPYG
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
SPYG
MTUM
Financial Services
SPYG
MTUM
Healthcare
SPYG
MTUM
Industrials
SPYG
MTUM
Utilities
SPYG
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
SPYG
MTUM
Real Estate
SPYG
MTUM
Basic Materials
SPYG
MTUM
Energy
SPYG
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYG vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
SPYG
MTUM
SPYG vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYG | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.36 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 3.55 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 13.66 | -5.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYG vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYG | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.63% | -34.08% | -33.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.76% | -11.54% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.14% | -20.99% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.67% | -32.28% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.67% | -34.08% | +1.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -1.55% | -3.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.30% | -6.20% | -18.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 2.99% | +0.43% |
Volatility
SPYG vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) is 6.33%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 10.89%. This indicates that SPYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYG | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 10.89% | -4.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 18.63% | -5.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.81% | 20.87% | -4.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 20.94% | +0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 21.20% | -0.50% |
SPYG vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYG vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than MTUM's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.61% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.48% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYG and MTUM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (10.89%) compared to SPYG (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 17.91% vs 17.15% for MTUM. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 17.91% return vs 17.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTUM.
MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.48% for SPYG.
SPYG is categorized as S&P 500, while MTUM is Momentum. SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.15% for MTUM.
MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYG and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer