PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPY vs. CLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPY vs. CLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPY achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 32.99% return. Over the past 10 years, SPY has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 15.42%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 43.71% annualized return.


SPY

1D
0.54%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
9.07%
6M
9.42%
1Y
24.27%
3Y*
20.86%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
15.42%

CLS

1D
1.88%
1M
5.52%
YTD
32.99%
6M
28.26%
1Y
200.71%
3Y*
207.28%
5Y*
116.26%
10Y*
43.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPY vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
9.07%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%
CLS
Celestica Inc.
32.99%220.27%215.23%159.80%1.26%37.92%-2.42%-5.70%-16.32%-11.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SPY and CLS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1998

0.51

The correlation between SPY and CLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPY vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

CLS
CLS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPY vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYCLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.37

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

6.91

-4.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.39

16.83

-4.44

SPY vs. CLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPY Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPY and CLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPY vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPY drawdown since its inception was -55.19%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPY and CLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYCLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.19%

-96.93%

+41.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-29.24%

+20.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-53.96%

+35.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

-53.96%

+29.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

-80.60%

+46.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-16.78%

+14.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-73.31%

+64.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

11.98%

-10.01%

Volatility

SPY vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) is 4.34%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 27.54%. This indicates that SPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYCLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

27.54%

-23.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

55.42%

-45.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

72.65%

-60.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.12%

57.70%

-40.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

49.97%

-32.01%

Dividends

SPY vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison

SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLS
Celestica Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPY and CLS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLS has higher volatility (27.54%) compared to SPY (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPY dropped -55.19% vs CLS's -96.93%.

CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPY and CLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer