SPXV vs. QLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPXV (ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-Health Care Index, while QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXV returned 16.38%/yr vs 36.10%/yr for QLD. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QLD.

Performance

SPXV vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXV achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 42.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXV has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of 16.38%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 36.10% annualized return.

SPXV

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 5.44%
• YTD: 12.35%
• 6M: 12.52%
• 1Y: 29.54%
• 3Y*: 24.48%
• 5Y*: 14.80%
• 10Y*: 16.38%

QLD

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 21.54%
• YTD: 42.06%
• 6M: 37.45%
• 1Y: 85.49%
• 3Y*: 50.15%
• 5Y*: 25.75%
• 10Y*: 36.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXV vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPXV ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF	12.35%	18.40%	28.02%	30.71%	-20.47%	28.37%	18.99%	33.58%	-3.81%	17.01%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	42.06%	30.36%	42.82%	117.72%	-60.52%	54.67%	88.90%	81.69%	-8.31%	70.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXV and QLD is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015	0.77

The correlation between SPXV and QLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.95 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPXV vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPXV	QLD
Technology	38.9%	53.8%
Financial Services	12.9%	0.2%
Communication Services	12.3%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	12.3%
Industrials	9.1%	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	7.7%
Energy	3.8%	0.6%
Utilities	2.6%	1.4%
Real Estate	2.1%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.1%
Healthcare	-	4.2%

Return for Risk

SPXV vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXV

SPXV Risk / Return Rank: 70
SPXV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
SPXV Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SPXV Omega Ratio Rank: 69
SPXV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SPXV Martin Ratio Rank: 75

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 69
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXV vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPXV	QLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.70	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	3.16	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.41	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	3.42	-0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.32	11.92	+2.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPXV vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXV Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXV and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPXV	QLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34	2.70	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	0.58	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	0.81	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.60	+0.31

Drawdowns

SPXV vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXV drawdown since its inception was -34.34%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXV and QLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPXV	QLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.34%	-83.13%	+48.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.15%	-25.13%	+15.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.89%	-42.29%	+22.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.58%	-63.68%	+37.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.34%	-63.68%	+29.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-0.53%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.52%	-18.17%	+13.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	7.20%	-5.13%

Volatility

SPXV vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) is 3.16%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 8.90%. This indicates that SPXV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPXV	QLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.16%	8.90%	-5.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.65%	24.08%	-14.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.69%	31.85%	-19.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.78%	44.74%	-26.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.01%	44.56%	-26.55%

SPXV vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPXV vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

SPXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than QLD's 0.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.12%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%
SPXV ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF	0.89%	0.97%	1.12%	1.27%	1.67%	1.11%	1.45%	1.58%	1.89%	1.57%	2.66%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPXV and QLD in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, SPXV and QLD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SPXV or QLD?

QLD has higher volatility (8.90%) compared to SPXV (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXV dropped -34.34% vs QLD's -83.13%.

Which ETF is better, SPXV or QLD?

On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 36.10% vs 16.38% for SPXV. On fees, SPXV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPXV has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPXV or QLD?

Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 36.10% return vs 16.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPXV or QLD?

SPXV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPXV or QLD?

SPXV has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.12% for QLD.

What is the main difference between SPXV and QLD?

SPXV is categorized as S&P 500, while QLD is Leveraged Equities. SPXV tracks S&P 500 Ex-Health Care Index, while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXV and 0.95% for QLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.