PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXV vs. SPXN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXV vs. SPXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) and ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPXV having a 9.08% return and SPXN slightly higher at 9.52%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPXV having a 16.03% annualized return and SPXN not far behind at 15.85%.


SPXV

1D
-1.52%
1M
-1.52%
YTD
9.08%
6M
8.22%
1Y
24.43%
3Y*
22.59%
5Y*
13.99%
10Y*
16.03%

SPXN

1D
-1.56%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
9.52%
6M
8.67%
1Y
26.79%
3Y*
21.05%
5Y*
13.71%
10Y*
15.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXV vs. SPXN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXV
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF
9.08%18.40%28.02%30.71%-20.47%28.37%18.99%33.58%-3.81%17.01%
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
9.52%18.74%24.35%28.57%-18.87%27.04%22.15%31.50%-3.85%20.84%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXV and SPXN is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015

0.89

The correlation between SPXV and SPXN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPXV vs. SPXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXV
SPXN

Technology

42.6%
44.8%

Financial Services

12.1%

-

Communication Services

11.6%
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
10.9%

Industrials

8.5%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.2%

Energy

3.4%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
3.0%

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.9%

Healthcare

-

9.6%

Technology

SPXV
42.6%
SPXN
44.8%

Financial Services

SPXV
12.1%
SPXN

-

Communication Services

SPXV
11.6%
SPXN
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SPXV
10.8%
SPXN
10.9%

Industrials

SPXV
8.5%
SPXN
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

SPXV
4.9%
SPXN
5.2%

Energy

SPXV
3.4%
SPXN
3.5%

Utilities

SPXV
2.3%
SPXN
3.0%

Real Estate

SPXV
2.0%
SPXN

-

Basic Materials

SPXV
1.8%
SPXN
1.9%

Healthcare

SPXV

-

SPXN
9.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXV vs. SPXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXV
SPXV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPXV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXV Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXN
SPXN Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SPXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXN Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXN Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXV vs. SPXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) and ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXVSPXNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.36

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

2.91

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.27

12.58

-1.31

SPXV vs. SPXN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXV Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the SPXN Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXV and SPXN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXV vs. SPXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXV drawdown since its inception was -34.34%, which is greater than SPXN's maximum drawdown of -32.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXV and SPXN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXVSPXNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.34%

-32.10%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.15%

-9.26%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.89%

-19.56%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-24.47%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.34%

-32.10%

-2.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.66%

-4.14%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.51%

-3.99%

-0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

2.14%

+0.03%

Volatility

SPXV vs. SPXN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) is 5.00%, while ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that SPXV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXVSPXNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

5.38%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.54%

10.73%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.34%

13.51%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.88%

17.30%

+0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

17.72%

+0.36%

SPXV vs. SPXN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPXV and SPXN have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPXV vs. SPXN - Dividend Comparison

SPXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than SPXN's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
0.90%0.98%1.12%1.19%1.35%0.94%1.09%1.41%1.76%1.54%2.60%0.52%
SPXV
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF
0.92%0.97%1.12%1.27%1.67%1.11%1.45%1.58%1.89%1.57%2.66%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SPXV and SPXN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPXN has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to SPXV (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXV dropped -34.34% vs SPXN's -32.10%.

On 10-year performance, SPXV leads with 16.03% vs 15.85% for SPXN. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, SPXV has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPXV has performed better with a 16.03% return vs 15.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXV and SPXN have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

SPXV has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.90% for SPXN.

SPXV tracks S&P 500 Ex-Health Care Index, while SPXN tracks S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index.

SPXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXV and SPXN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer