SPXV vs. SPXN
SPXV (ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF) and SPXN (ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF) are both S&P 500 funds from ProShares - SPXV tracks the S&P 500 Ex-Health Care Index while SPXN tracks the S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXV returned 16.03%/yr vs 15.85%/yr for SPXN. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
SPXV vs. SPXN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPXV having a 9.08% return and SPXN slightly higher at 9.52%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPXV having a 16.03% annualized return and SPXN not far behind at 15.85%.
SPXV
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -1.52%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 8.22%
- 1Y
- 24.43%
- 3Y*
- 22.59%
- 5Y*
- 13.99%
- 10Y*
- 16.03%
SPXN
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 6M
- 8.67%
- 1Y
- 26.79%
- 3Y*
- 21.05%
- 5Y*
- 13.71%
- 10Y*
- 15.85%
SPXV vs. SPXN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXV ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF | 9.08% | 18.40% | 28.02% | 30.71% | -20.47% | 28.37% | 18.99% | 33.58% | -3.81% | 17.01% |
SPXN ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF | 9.52% | 18.74% | 24.35% | 28.57% | -18.87% | 27.04% | 22.15% | 31.50% | -3.85% | 20.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXV and SPXN is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015 | 0.89 |
The correlation between SPXV and SPXN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPXV vs. SPXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXV
SPXN
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Technology
SPXV
SPXN
Financial Services
SPXV
SPXN
-
Communication Services
SPXV
SPXN
Consumer Cyclical
SPXV
SPXN
Industrials
SPXV
SPXN
Consumer Defensive
SPXV
SPXN
Energy
SPXV
SPXN
Utilities
SPXV
SPXN
Real Estate
SPXV
SPXN
-
Basic Materials
SPXV
SPXN
Healthcare
SPXV
-
SPXN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXV vs. SPXN — Risk / Return Rank
SPXV
SPXN
SPXV vs. SPXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) and ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXV | SPXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.36 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 2.91 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.27 | 12.58 | -1.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXV vs. SPXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXV drawdown since its inception was -34.34%, which is greater than SPXN's maximum drawdown of -32.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXV and SPXN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXV | SPXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.34% | -32.10% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.15% | -9.26% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.89% | -19.56% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -24.47% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.34% | -32.10% | -2.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.66% | -4.14% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.51% | -3.99% | -0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 2.14% | +0.03% |
Volatility
SPXV vs. SPXN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) is 5.00%, while ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that SPXV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXV | SPXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 5.38% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.54% | 10.73% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.34% | 13.51% | -0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.88% | 17.30% | +0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 17.72% | +0.36% |
SPXV vs. SPXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPXV and SPXN have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPXV vs. SPXN - Dividend Comparison
SPXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than SPXN's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXN ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF | 0.90% | 0.98% | 1.12% | 1.19% | 1.35% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 1.41% | 1.76% | 1.54% | 2.60% | 0.52% |
SPXV ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF | 0.92% | 0.97% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.67% | 1.11% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.89% | 1.57% | 2.66% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, SPXV and SPXN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPXN has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to SPXV (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXV dropped -34.34% vs SPXN's -32.10%.
On 10-year performance, SPXV leads with 16.03% vs 15.85% for SPXN. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, SPXV has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPXV has performed better with a 16.03% return vs 15.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXV and SPXN have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
SPXV has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.90% for SPXN.
SPXV tracks S&P 500 Ex-Health Care Index, while SPXN tracks S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index.
SPXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXV and SPXN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer