SPXV vs. FTEC
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC).
SPXV and FTEC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPXV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Ex-Health Care Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2015. FTEC is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both SPXV and FTEC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPXV or FTEC.
Key characteristics
| SPXV | FTEC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 29.29% | 29.50% |
| 1Y Return | 40.16% | 41.47% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 12.20% | 12.65% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 18.17% | 23.15% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.15 | 1.93 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.11 | 2.50 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.58 | 1.34 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.42 | 2.67 |
| Martin Ratio | 20.32 | 9.64 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.04% | 4.23% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.17% | 21.08% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.34% | -34.95% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.78% | -0.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXV and FTEC is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SPXV vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPXV having a 29.29% return and FTEC slightly higher at 29.50%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPXV vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXV has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPXV vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPXV vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
SPXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than FTEC's 0.61% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXV ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF | 1.14% | 1.27% | 1.67% | 1.40% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.90% | 1.56% | 3.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.61% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% | 1.09% | 0.18% |
Drawdowns
SPXV vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXV drawdown since its inception was -34.34%, roughly equal to the maximum FTEC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXV and FTEC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPXV vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) is 4.27%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that SPXV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.