PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXM vs. GXLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXM vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SPXM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
8.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GXLC

1D
-0.75%
1M
1.35%
6M
8.42%
YTD
10.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXM vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.00%2.22%
GXLC
Global X U.S. 500 ETF
10.46%3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXM and GXLC is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXM vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXM
SPXM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SPXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

GXLC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXM vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXMGXLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.84

SPXM vs. GXLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXM vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXM drawdown since its inception was -5.08%, smaller than the maximum GXLC drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXM and GXLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXMGXLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-9.08%

+4.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-1.12%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-1.55%

+0.77%

Volatility

SPXM vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXMGXLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.68%

13.60%

-5.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.64%

13.60%

-5.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.64%

13.60%

-5.96%

SPXM vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXM has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXM vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

SPXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than GXLC's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM2025
GXLC
Global X U.S. 500 ETF
0.63%0.30%
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.24%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXM and GXLC have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SPXM.

GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.

They also come from different issuers: Azoria and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for SPXM and 0.02% for GXLC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXM and GXLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer