PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXL vs. TMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXL vs. TMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXL achieves a 28.14% return, which is significantly higher than TMF's -6.13% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXL has outperformed TMF with an annualized return of 30.20%, while TMF has yielded a comparatively lower -16.56% annualized return.


SPXL

1D
-2.08%
1M
14.77%
YTD
28.14%
6M
26.88%
1Y
81.54%
3Y*
52.83%
5Y*
23.51%
10Y*
30.20%

TMF

1D
-1.14%
1M
1.22%
YTD
-6.13%
6M
-11.63%
1Y
0.90%
3Y*
-20.78%
5Y*
-30.52%
10Y*
-16.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXL vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF
28.14%31.94%63.61%69.49%-56.55%98.75%9.64%102.80%-25.11%71.03%
TMF
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF
-6.13%-2.94%-35.95%-13.01%-72.60%-19.80%39.02%34.75%-11.01%22.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXL and TMF is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2009

-0.25

The correlation between SPXL and TMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPXL vs. TMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXL
TMF

Technology

8.5%

-

Financial Services

2.6%
18.7%

Communication Services

2.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.2%

-

Healthcare

1.9%

-

Industrials

1.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.1%

-

Energy

0.8%

-

Utilities

0.6%

-

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

0.4%

-

Technology

SPXL
8.5%
TMF

-

Financial Services

SPXL
2.6%
TMF
18.7%

Communication Services

SPXL
2.4%
TMF

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPXL
2.2%
TMF

-

Healthcare

SPXL
1.9%
TMF

-

Industrials

SPXL
1.7%
TMF

-

Consumer Defensive

SPXL
1.1%
TMF

-

Energy

SPXL
0.8%
TMF

-

Utilities

SPXL
0.6%
TMF

-

Real Estate

SPXL
0.4%
TMF

-

Basic Materials

SPXL
0.4%
TMF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXL vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXL
SPXL Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SPXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXL Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

TMF
TMF Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMF Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMF Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXL vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXLTMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.03

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

0.03

+3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.94

0.08

+12.86

SPXL vs. TMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXL Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the TMF Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXL and TMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXLTMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

0.03

+2.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

-0.66

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

-0.38

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

-0.14

+0.66

Drawdowns

SPXL vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXL drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXL and TMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXLTMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.86%

-92.89%

+16.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.77%

-26.51%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.95%

-56.31%

+7.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.80%

-88.81%

+25.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.86%

-92.89%

+16.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-92.23%

+90.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.72%

-43.63%

+27.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.32%

11.49%

-5.17%

Volatility

SPXL vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) have volatilities of 8.49% and 8.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXLTMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.49%

8.09%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.67%

19.01%

+7.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.39%

28.76%

+6.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.24%

46.75%

+3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.42%

43.92%

+9.50%

SPXL vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXL has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXL vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison

SPXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than TMF's 4.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF
0.52%0.69%0.74%0.98%0.32%0.11%0.22%0.84%1.02%3.88%
TMF
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF
4.15%4.06%4.29%2.82%1.62%0.13%2.23%0.94%1.49%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXL and TMF have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPXL has higher volatility (8.49%) compared to TMF (8.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXL dropped -76.86% vs TMF's -92.89%.

On 10-year performance, SPXL leads with 30.20% vs -16.56% for TMF. On fees, SPXL is cheaper at 0.84% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 8.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 30.20% return vs -16.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXL is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TMF.

TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 0.52% for SPXL.

SPXL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. SPXL tracks S&P 500, while TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.84% for SPXL and 1.01% for TMF.

SPXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXL and TMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer