SPXL vs. TQQQ
SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds - SPXL tracks the S&P 500 while TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXL returned 30.05%/yr vs 45.79%/yr for TQQQ. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPXL charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.
Performance
SPXL vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXL achieves a 23.87% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 57.45% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXL has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 30.05%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.79% annualized return.
SPXL
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 23.87%
- 6M
- 24.20%
- 1Y
- 77.22%
- 3Y*
- 46.89%
- 5Y*
- 23.80%
- 10Y*
- 30.05%
TQQQ
- 1D
- 6.87%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 57.45%
- 6M
- 55.34%
- 1Y
- 130.36%
- 3Y*
- 61.43%
- 5Y*
- 25.74%
- 10Y*
- 45.79%
SPXL vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 23.87% | 31.94% | 63.61% | 69.49% | -56.55% | 98.75% | 9.64% | 102.80% | -25.11% | 71.03% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 57.45% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXL and TQQQ is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.90 |
The correlation between SPXL and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPXL vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXL
TQQQ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPXL
TQQQ
Financial Services
SPXL
TQQQ
Communication Services
SPXL
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
SPXL
TQQQ
Healthcare
SPXL
TQQQ
Industrials
SPXL
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
SPXL
TQQQ
Energy
SPXL
TQQQ
Utilities
SPXL
TQQQ
Real Estate
SPXL
TQQQ
Basic Materials
SPXL
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXL vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SPXL
TQQQ
SPXL vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXL | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.36 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 3.46 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.63 | 11.05 | +0.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXL vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXL drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXL and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXL | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.86% | -81.66% | +4.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.77% | -36.97% | +10.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.95% | -58.04% | +9.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.80% | -81.66% | +17.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.86% | -81.66% | +4.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.35% | -4.99% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.10% | -18.50% | +2.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.51% | 11.55% | -5.04% |
Volatility
SPXL vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) is 14.25%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 25.44%. This indicates that SPXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXL | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.25% | 25.44% | -11.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.44% | 42.61% | -13.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.13% | 52.43% | -15.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.52% | 67.25% | -16.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.55% | 66.33% | -12.78% |
SPXL vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXL has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXL vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SPXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than TQQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.54% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.38% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SPXL and TQQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TQQQ has higher volatility (25.44%) compared to SPXL (14.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXL dropped -76.86% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.79% vs 30.05% for SPXL. On fees, SPXL is cheaper at 0.84% per year. On volatility, SPXL has been the lower-risk option at 14.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.79% return vs 30.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXL is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.
SPXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.38% for TQQQ.
SPXL tracks S&P 500, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for SPXL and 0.95% for TQQQ.
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXL and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer