SPXD vs. FNDF
SPXD (Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight Index, while FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). Both are passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXD charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.
Performance
SPXD vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXD achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 20.97% return.
SPXD
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDF
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 5.03%
- YTD
- 20.97%
- 6M
- 24.09%
- 1Y
- 43.94%
- 3Y*
- 24.21%
- 5Y*
- 13.31%
- 10Y*
- 11.80%
SPXD vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPXD Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF | 10.08% | 5.02% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF | 20.97% | 12.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXD and FNDF is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXD vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank
SPXD
FNDF
SPXD vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF (SPXD) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXD | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.70 | 0.54 | +1.17 |
Drawdowns
SPXD vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXD drawdown since its inception was -7.53%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXD and FNDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXD | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.53% | -40.14% | +32.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.87% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | -7.64% | +6.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.77% | — |
Volatility
SPXD vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXD | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.78% | 15.04% | -4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 16.18% | -5.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 17.67% | -6.89% |
SPXD vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXD has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPXD vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison
SPXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than FNDF's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF | 2.84% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% |
SPXD Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF | 1.02% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXD and FNDF have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXD is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXD is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.
FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 1.02% for SPXD.
SPXD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SPXD tracks S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight Index, while FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXD and 0.25% for FNDF.
Find the right allocation for SPXD and FNDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer