SPXD vs. PRF
SPXD (Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF) and PRF (Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - SPXD tracks the S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight Index while PRF tracks the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPXD charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for PRF.
Performance
SPXD vs. PRF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXD achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly lower than PRF's 15.36% return.
SPXD
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRF
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 15.36%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- 1Y
- 31.42%
- 3Y*
- 21.06%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 14.32%
SPXD vs. PRF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPXD Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF | 10.76% | 4.54% |
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 15.36% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXD and PRF is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXD vs. PRF — Risk / Return Rank
SPXD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PRF
SPXD vs. PRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF (SPXD) and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXD | PRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.53 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.79 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 19.48 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXD vs. PRF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXD drawdown since its inception was -7.53%, smaller than the maximum PRF drawdown of -60.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXD and PRF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXD | PRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.53% | -60.35% | +52.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -0.93% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.21% | -6.91% | +5.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.62% | — |
Volatility
SPXD vs. PRF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXD | PRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.84% | 10.95% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.84% | 15.19% | -4.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.84% | 17.64% | -6.80% |
SPXD vs. PRF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXD has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PRF's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXD vs. PRF - Dividend Comparison
SPXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than PRF's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 1.38% | 1.59% | 1.78% | 1.84% | 2.01% | 1.58% | 1.97% | 1.99% | 2.25% | 1.58% | 2.17% | 2.25% |
SPXD Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF | 1.40% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SPXD and PRF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPXD is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXD is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for PRF.
SPXD has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 1.38% for PRF.
SPXD tracks S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight Index, while PRF tracks RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXD and 0.34% for PRF.
Find the right allocation for SPXD and PRF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer