SPXD vs. SCHV
SPXD (Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - SPXD tracks the S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight Index while SCHV tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPXD charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHV.
Performance
SPXD vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXD achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 15.97% return.
SPXD
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHV
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 15.97%
- 6M
- 16.54%
- 1Y
- 29.76%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
SPXD vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPXD Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF | 10.08% | 5.02% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 15.97% | 5.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXD and SCHV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXD vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank
SPXD
SCHV
SPXD vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF (SPXD) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXD | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.70 | 0.72 | +0.98 |
Drawdowns
SPXD vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXD drawdown since its inception was -7.53%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXD and SCHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXD | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.53% | -37.08% | +29.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | -3.83% | +2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.68% | — |
Volatility
SPXD vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXD | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.78% | 10.63% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 14.51% | -3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 16.93% | -6.15% |
SPXD vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXD has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPXD vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison
SPXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than SCHV's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.75% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
SPXD Xtrackers S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight ETF | 1.02% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SPXD and SCHV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPXD.
SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.02% for SPXD.
SPXD tracks S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight Index, while SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXD and 0.04% for SCHV.
Find the right allocation for SPXD and SCHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer