PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXB vs. ASHR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXB vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Bond ETF (SPXB) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SPXB

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ASHR

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.02%
YTD
10.11%
6M
13.67%
1Y
39.07%
3Y*
12.07%
5Y*
-1.24%
10Y*
5.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXB vs. ASHR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SPXB
ProShares S&P 500 Bond ETF
0.00%0.00%-3.45%8.83%-16.66%-1.89%10.33%15.34%1.13%
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund
10.11%27.02%11.95%-12.52%-27.52%-1.57%36.29%36.50%-25.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXB and ASHR is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2018

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXB vs. ASHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXB

ASHR
ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXB vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Bond ETF (SPXB) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SPXB vs. ASHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXBASHRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

Drawdowns

SPXB vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXBASHRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

Volatility

SPXB vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXBASHRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.06%

SPXB vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHR's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXB vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison

SPXB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund
2.10%2.31%1.13%2.48%1.13%0.88%0.81%0.98%1.32%0.84%0.73%30.13%
SPXB
ProShares S&P 500 Bond ETF
0.00%0.00%1.22%4.04%3.14%2.00%2.64%3.48%2.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXB and ASHR have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHR.

ASHR has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.00% for SPXB.

SPXB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while ASHR is China Equities. SPXB tracks S&P 500 MarketAxess Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, while ASHR tracks CSI 300 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPXB and 0.65% for ASHR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXB and ASHR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer