PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXB vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXB vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Bond ETF (SPXB) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SPXB

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MTUM

1D
1.06%
1M
15.90%
YTD
31.75%
6M
32.38%
1Y
41.76%
3Y*
34.75%
5Y*
15.21%
10Y*
17.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXB vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SPXB
ProShares S&P 500 Bond ETF
0.00%0.00%-3.45%8.83%-16.66%-1.89%10.33%15.34%1.13%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
31.75%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-4.92%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXB and MTUM is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2018

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXB vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXB

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXB vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Bond ETF (SPXB) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SPXB vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXBMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

Drawdowns

SPXB vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXBMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

Volatility

SPXB vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXBMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.03%

SPXB vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPXB and MTUM have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPXB vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

SPXB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
SPXB
ProShares S&P 500 Bond ETF
0.00%0.00%1.22%4.04%3.14%2.00%2.64%3.48%2.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXB and MTUM have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXB and MTUM have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for SPXB.

SPXB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while MTUM is Momentum. SPXB tracks S&P 500 MarketAxess Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXB and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer