PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPUU vs. ROM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPUU vs. ROM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUU achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly lower than ROM's 67.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SPUU has underperformed ROM with an annualized return of 25.04%, while ROM has yielded a comparatively higher 42.53% annualized return.


SPUU

1D
3.36%
1M
3.66%
YTD
19.44%
6M
19.99%
1Y
52.90%
3Y*
35.39%
5Y*
20.14%
10Y*
25.04%

ROM

1D
7.62%
1M
16.55%
YTD
67.66%
6M
71.14%
1Y
133.22%
3Y*
52.64%
5Y*
29.24%
10Y*
42.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPUU vs. ROM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
19.44%26.55%44.25%47.28%-38.72%61.27%21.85%66.84%-14.59%44.33%
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
67.66%35.63%31.65%130.70%-63.86%77.75%80.42%102.10%-9.89%81.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SPUU and ROM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014

0.85

The correlation between SPUU and ROM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPUU vs. ROM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPUU
ROM

Technology

39.0%
57.9%

Financial Services

11.1%
3.3%

Communication Services

10.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%

-

Healthcare

8.3%

-

Industrials

7.8%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%

-

Energy

3.1%
0.1%

Utilities

2.1%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

SPUU
39.0%
ROM
57.9%

Financial Services

SPUU
11.1%
ROM
3.3%

Communication Services

SPUU
10.6%
ROM

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPUU
9.9%
ROM

-

Healthcare

SPUU
8.3%
ROM

-

Industrials

SPUU
7.8%
ROM
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

SPUU
4.5%
ROM

-

Energy

SPUU
3.1%
ROM
0.1%

Utilities

SPUU
2.1%
ROM

-

Real Estate

SPUU
1.8%
ROM

-

Basic Materials

SPUU
1.7%
ROM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPUU vs. ROM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

ROM
ROM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ROM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ROM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPUU vs. ROM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPUUROMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.41

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

4.15

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.56

12.28

+0.28

SPUU vs. ROM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUU Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the ROM Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUU and ROM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPUU vs. ROM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUU drawdown since its inception was -59.35%, smaller than the maximum ROM drawdown of -83.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUU and ROM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPUUROMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.35%

-83.36%

+24.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.19%

-32.33%

+14.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.18%

-48.10%

+12.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.59%

-67.55%

+20.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.35%

-67.55%

+8.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-7.56%

+5.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.49%

-20.86%

+11.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

10.89%

-6.67%

Volatility

SPUU vs. ROM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) is 9.23%, while ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a volatility of 23.16%. This indicates that SPUU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPUUROMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.23%

23.16%

-13.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.71%

38.71%

-19.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.95%

45.83%

-20.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.64%

52.28%

-18.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.84%

50.18%

-14.34%

SPUU vs. ROM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUU has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ROM's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPUU vs. ROM - Dividend Comparison

SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than ROM's 0.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
0.15%0.24%0.21%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.16%0.30%0.08%0.20%0.12%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
1.34%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPUU and ROM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROM has higher volatility (23.16%) compared to SPUU (9.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUU dropped -59.35% vs ROM's -83.36%.

On 10-year performance, ROM leads with 42.53% vs 25.04% for SPUU. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 9.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ROM has performed better with a 42.53% return vs 25.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROM.

SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.15% for ROM.

SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200% Daily), while ROM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SPUU and 0.95% for ROM.

ROM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPUU and ROM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer