SPUU vs. ROM
SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF) and ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology) are both Leveraged Equities funds - SPUU tracks the S&P 500 Index (200% Daily) while ROM tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPUU returned 25.04%/yr vs 42.53%/yr for ROM. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPUU charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ROM.
Performance
SPUU vs. ROM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPUU achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly lower than ROM's 67.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SPUU has underperformed ROM with an annualized return of 25.04%, while ROM has yielded a comparatively higher 42.53% annualized return.
SPUU
- 1D
- 3.36%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 19.44%
- 6M
- 19.99%
- 1Y
- 52.90%
- 3Y*
- 35.39%
- 5Y*
- 20.14%
- 10Y*
- 25.04%
ROM
- 1D
- 7.62%
- 1M
- 16.55%
- YTD
- 67.66%
- 6M
- 71.14%
- 1Y
- 133.22%
- 3Y*
- 52.64%
- 5Y*
- 29.24%
- 10Y*
- 42.53%
SPUU vs. ROM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 19.44% | 26.55% | 44.25% | 47.28% | -38.72% | 61.27% | 21.85% | 66.84% | -14.59% | 44.33% |
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 67.66% | 35.63% | 31.65% | 130.70% | -63.86% | 77.75% | 80.42% | 102.10% | -9.89% | 81.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPUU and ROM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014 | 0.85 |
The correlation between SPUU and ROM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPUU vs. ROM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPUU
ROM
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SPUU
ROM
Financial Services
SPUU
ROM
Communication Services
SPUU
ROM
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPUU
ROM
-
Healthcare
SPUU
ROM
-
Industrials
SPUU
ROM
Consumer Defensive
SPUU
ROM
-
Energy
SPUU
ROM
Utilities
SPUU
ROM
-
Real Estate
SPUU
ROM
-
Basic Materials
SPUU
ROM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPUU vs. ROM — Risk / Return Rank
SPUU
ROM
SPUU vs. ROM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPUU | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.41 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 4.15 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.56 | 12.28 | +0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPUU vs. ROM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPUU drawdown since its inception was -59.35%, smaller than the maximum ROM drawdown of -83.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUU and ROM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPUU | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.35% | -83.36% | +24.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.19% | -32.33% | +14.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.18% | -48.10% | +12.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.59% | -67.55% | +20.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.35% | -67.55% | +8.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -7.56% | +5.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.49% | -20.86% | +11.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 10.89% | -6.67% |
Volatility
SPUU vs. ROM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) is 9.23%, while ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a volatility of 23.16%. This indicates that SPUU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPUU | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.23% | 23.16% | -13.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.71% | 38.71% | -19.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.95% | 45.83% | -20.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.64% | 52.28% | -18.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.84% | 50.18% | -14.34% |
SPUU vs. ROM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPUU has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ROM's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPUU vs. ROM - Dividend Comparison
SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than ROM's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 0.15% | 0.24% | 0.21% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.12% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 1.34% | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 3.04% | 8.03% | 1.80% | 5.50% | 6.96% | 8.08% | 4.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPUU and ROM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROM has higher volatility (23.16%) compared to SPUU (9.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUU dropped -59.35% vs ROM's -83.36%.
On 10-year performance, ROM leads with 42.53% vs 25.04% for SPUU. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 9.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ROM has performed better with a 42.53% return vs 25.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROM.
SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.15% for ROM.
SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200% Daily), while ROM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SPUU and 0.95% for ROM.
ROM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPUU and ROM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer