PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMO vs. VO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMO vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 28.15% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 10.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed VO with an annualized return of 20.86%, while VO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.77% annualized return.


SPMO

1D
1.26%
1M
4.23%
YTD
28.15%
6M
28.70%
1Y
43.47%
3Y*
41.53%
5Y*
23.50%
10Y*
20.86%

VO

1D
0.97%
1M
3.61%
YTD
10.43%
6M
9.31%
1Y
18.17%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*
11.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMO vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
28.15%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
10.43%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and VO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.69

The correlation between SPMO and VO shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPMO vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPMO
VO

Technology

54.8%
18.6%

Industrials

10.9%
17.9%

Communication Services

8.7%
3.1%

Healthcare

6.2%
7.6%

Financial Services

5.7%
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
4.8%

Energy

3.1%
8.5%

Utilities

2.5%
8.3%

Basic Materials

1.6%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
8.6%

Real Estate

0.9%
5.4%

Technology

SPMO
54.8%
VO
18.6%

Industrials

SPMO
10.9%
VO
17.9%

Communication Services

SPMO
8.7%
VO
3.1%

Healthcare

SPMO
6.2%
VO
7.6%

Financial Services

SPMO
5.7%
VO
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPMO
4.0%
VO
4.8%

Energy

SPMO
3.1%
VO
8.5%

Utilities

SPMO
2.5%
VO
8.3%

Basic Materials

SPMO
1.6%
VO
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SPMO
1.3%
VO
8.6%

Real Estate

SPMO
0.9%
VO
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMO vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMO vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPMOVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.25

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

2.23

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.01

8.44

+4.57

SPMO vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the VO Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and VO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and VO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMOVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-58.87%

+27.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-8.17%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-19.02%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

-27.57%

+4.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

-39.37%

+8.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-0.45%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-7.85%

+3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

2.16%

+1.19%

Volatility

SPMO vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 10.29% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 4.31%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMOVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.29%

4.31%

+5.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.73%

9.71%

+7.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.48%

12.74%

+6.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

17.65%

+2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.48%

18.96%

+1.52%

SPMO vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPMO vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than VO's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.67%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.36%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMO and VO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to VO (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs VO's -58.87%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.86% vs 11.77% for VO. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 11.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for SPMO.

VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.67% for SPMO.

SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while VO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.03% for VO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMO and VO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer