SPMO vs. VO
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPMO returned 20.86%/yr vs 11.77%/yr for VO. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.
Performance
SPMO vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 28.15% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 10.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed VO with an annualized return of 20.86%, while VO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.77% annualized return.
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 6M
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 43.47%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.86%
VO
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.77%
SPMO vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.15% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.43% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and VO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.69 |
The correlation between SPMO and VO shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPMO vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPMO
VO
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
SPMO
VO
Industrials
SPMO
VO
Communication Services
SPMO
VO
Healthcare
SPMO
VO
Financial Services
SPMO
VO
Consumer Defensive
SPMO
VO
Energy
SPMO
VO
Utilities
SPMO
VO
Basic Materials
SPMO
VO
Consumer Cyclical
SPMO
VO
Real Estate
SPMO
VO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
VO
SPMO vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPMO | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.25 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 2.23 | +1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.01 | 8.44 | +4.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -58.87% | +27.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -8.17% | -4.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -19.02% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | -27.57% | +4.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | -39.37% | +8.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -0.45% | -1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -7.85% | +3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 2.16% | +1.19% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 10.29% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 4.31%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.29% | 4.31% | +5.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.73% | 9.71% | +7.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.48% | 12.74% | +6.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 17.65% | +2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 18.96% | +1.52% |
SPMO vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPMO vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than VO's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and VO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to VO (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs VO's -58.87%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.86% vs 11.77% for VO. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 11.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for SPMO.
VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.67% for SPMO.
SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while VO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.03% for VO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer