PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMO vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMO vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 26.49% return, which is significantly higher than XMMO's 15.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 20.10%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively lower 18.39% annualized return.


SPMO

1D
-0.60%
1M
-1.77%
6M
28.96%
YTD
26.49%
1Y
32.07%
3Y*
39.71%
5Y*
20.97%
10Y*
20.10%
ALL TIME*
19.38%

XMMO

1D
-0.69%
1M
-3.38%
6M
13.16%
YTD
15.38%
1Y
23.91%
3Y*
25.50%
5Y*
13.92%
10Y*
18.39%
ALL TIME*
12.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$342.72M$341.89M$352.43M
$62.05M$68.99M$66.59M

SPMO vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
26.49%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
15.38%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and XMMO is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.73

The correlation between SPMO and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPMO vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPMO
XMMO

Technology

53.7%
12.9%

Industrials

11.2%
37.0%

Communication Services

7.4%
1.7%

Healthcare

6.9%
8.1%

Financial Services

6.0%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
0.5%

Energy

3.3%
8.4%

Utilities

2.7%
6.0%

Basic Materials

1.9%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

1.2%
5.0%

Real Estate

1.1%
7.2%

Technology

SPMO
53.7%
XMMO
12.9%

Industrials

SPMO
11.2%
XMMO
37.0%

Communication Services

SPMO
7.4%
XMMO
1.7%

Healthcare

SPMO
6.9%
XMMO
8.1%

Financial Services

SPMO
6.0%
XMMO
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

SPMO
4.2%
XMMO
0.5%

Energy

SPMO
3.3%
XMMO
8.4%

Utilities

SPMO
2.7%
XMMO
6.0%

Basic Materials

SPMO
1.9%
XMMO
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SPMO
1.2%
XMMO
5.0%

Real Estate

SPMO
1.1%
XMMO
7.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMO vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPMO vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPMOXMMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.20

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

1.73

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

6.99

+0.36

SPMO vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMOXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-55.37%

+24.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.64%

-13.91%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-24.93%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

-27.91%

+5.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

-36.74%

+5.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.05%

-8.39%

+1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-9.42%

+4.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.37%

3.43%

+0.94%

Volatility

SPMO vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 10.70% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) at 7.82%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMOXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.70%

7.82%

+2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.85%

18.63%

+3.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.09%

21.60%

+2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.69%

21.90%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.97%

22.45%

-1.48%

SPMO vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPMO vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than XMMO's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.70%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.61%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMO and XMMO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (10.70%) compared to XMMO (7.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.10% vs 18.39% for XMMO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XMMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.10% return vs 18.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.61% for XMMO.

SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.35% for XMMO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMO and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer