PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMO vs. IWF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMO vs. IWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 28.15% return, which is significantly higher than IWF's 2.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed IWF with an annualized return of 20.86%, while IWF has yielded a comparatively lower 18.17% annualized return.


SPMO

1D
1.26%
1M
4.23%
YTD
28.15%
6M
28.70%
1Y
43.47%
3Y*
41.53%
5Y*
23.50%
10Y*
20.86%

IWF

1D
0.03%
1M
-2.17%
YTD
2.87%
6M
3.39%
1Y
18.87%
3Y*
22.33%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
18.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMO vs. IWF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
28.15%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
2.87%18.33%33.12%42.59%-29.31%27.43%38.25%35.86%-1.67%29.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and IWF is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.79

The correlation between SPMO and IWF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPMO vs. IWF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPMO
IWF

Technology

54.8%
53.2%

Industrials

10.9%
5.0%

Communication Services

8.7%
12.3%

Healthcare

6.2%
7.0%

Financial Services

5.7%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
2.5%

Energy

3.1%
0.4%

Utilities

2.5%
1.1%

Basic Materials

1.6%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
12.7%

Real Estate

0.9%
0.4%

Technology

SPMO
54.8%
IWF
53.2%

Industrials

SPMO
10.9%
IWF
5.0%

Communication Services

SPMO
8.7%
IWF
12.3%

Healthcare

SPMO
6.2%
IWF
7.0%

Financial Services

SPMO
5.7%
IWF
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

SPMO
4.0%
IWF
2.5%

Energy

SPMO
3.1%
IWF
0.4%

Utilities

SPMO
2.5%
IWF
1.1%

Basic Materials

SPMO
1.6%
IWF
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SPMO
1.3%
IWF
12.7%

Real Estate

SPMO
0.9%
IWF
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMO vs. IWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

IWF
IWF Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
IWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWF Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWF Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMO vs. IWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPMOIWFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.21

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

1.16

+2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.01

3.83

+9.17

SPMO vs. IWF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the IWF Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and IWF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. IWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum IWF drawdown of -64.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and IWF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMOIWFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-64.25%

+33.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-16.27%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-23.36%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

-32.72%

+9.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

-32.72%

+1.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-5.56%

+3.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-22.06%

+17.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

4.93%

-1.58%

Volatility

SPMO vs. IWF - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a higher volatility of 10.29% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) at 5.36%. This indicates that SPMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMOIWFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.29%

5.36%

+4.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.73%

12.40%

+4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.48%

15.95%

+3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

21.46%

-1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.48%

21.00%

-0.52%

SPMO vs. IWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than IWF's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPMO vs. IWF - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than IWF's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.35%0.36%0.46%0.67%0.91%0.49%0.66%0.99%1.27%1.10%1.43%1.37%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.67%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMO and IWF have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to IWF (5.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs IWF's -64.25%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.86% vs 18.17% for IWF. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, IWF has been the lower-risk option at 5.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 18.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IWF.

SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.35% for IWF.

SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while IWF is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while IWF tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.18% for IWF.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMO and IWF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer