SPMO vs. CIBR
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPMO returned 20.86%/yr vs 17.88%/yr for CIBR. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.
Performance
SPMO vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 28.15% return, which is significantly higher than CIBR's 19.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 20.86%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively lower 17.88% annualized return.
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 6M
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 43.47%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.86%
CIBR
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 12.50%
- YTD
- 19.63%
- 6M
- 15.68%
- 1Y
- 17.38%
- 3Y*
- 24.30%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 17.88%
SPMO vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.15% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 19.63% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 28.52% | 1.47% | 18.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and CIBR is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.62 |
The correlation between SPMO and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.65 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPMO vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPMO
CIBR
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPMO
CIBR
Industrials
SPMO
CIBR
Communication Services
SPMO
CIBR
Healthcare
SPMO
CIBR
-
Financial Services
SPMO
CIBR
-
Consumer Defensive
SPMO
CIBR
-
Energy
SPMO
CIBR
-
Utilities
SPMO
CIBR
-
Basic Materials
SPMO
CIBR
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPMO
CIBR
-
Real Estate
SPMO
CIBR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
CIBR
SPMO vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPMO | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.14 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 0.79 | +2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.01 | 1.86 | +11.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -33.89% | +2.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -21.99% | +9.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -21.99% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | -33.89% | +11.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | -33.89% | +2.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -9.53% | +7.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -8.66% | +4.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 9.38% | -6.03% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) is 10.29%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 12.35%. This indicates that SPMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.29% | 12.35% | -2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.73% | 21.72% | -4.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.48% | 25.16% | -5.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 25.04% | -5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 23.65% | -3.17% |
SPMO vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPMO vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than CIBR's 0.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and CIBR have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (12.35%) compared to SPMO (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs CIBR's -33.89%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.86% vs 17.88% for CIBR. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 10.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 17.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.48% for CIBR.
SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.60% for CIBR.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer