PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPM.MI vs. GIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SPM.MI vs. GIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Saipem SpA (SPM.MI) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPM.MI is traded in EUR, while GIS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GIS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPM.MI achieves a 102.43% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -22.29% return. Over the past 10 years, SPM.MI has underperformed GIS with an annualized return of -4.87%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively higher -2.94% annualized return.


SPM.MI

1D
0.85%
1M
6.73%
YTD
102.43%
6M
110.24%
1Y
104.11%
3Y*
60.15%
5Y*
-0.99%
10Y*
-4.87%

GIS

1D
2.12%
1M
3.98%
YTD
-22.29%
6M
-22.65%
1Y
-33.26%
3Y*
-23.18%
5Y*
-6.99%
10Y*
-2.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPM.MI vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPM.MI
Saipem SpA
102.43%4.29%70.75%30.09%-75.59%-16.27%-49.38%33.29%-14.14%-28.89%
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
-22.29%-32.79%8.14%-22.36%36.03%27.39%4.23%46.36%-28.36%-12.86%

Correlation

The correlation between SPM.MI and GIS is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007

-0.01

The correlation between SPM.MI and GIS shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPM.MI vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPM.MI
SPM.MI Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SPM.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPM.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPM.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SPM.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPM.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

GIS
GIS Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
GIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
GIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIS Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPM.MI vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saipem SpA (SPM.MI) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPM.MIGISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

0.77

+0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.07

-0.91

+7.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.93

-1.82

+19.75

SPM.MI vs. GIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPM.MI Sharpe Ratio is 3.29, which is higher than the GIS Sharpe Ratio of -1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPM.MI and GIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPM.MI vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPM.MI drawdown since its inception was -99.54%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPM.MI and GIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPM.MIGISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.54%

-62.26%

-37.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.73%

-36.81%

+22.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.09%

-58.01%

+16.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.70%

-62.26%

-27.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.91%

-62.26%

-33.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.80%

-59.40%

-36.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.66%

-14.64%

-51.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.81%

19.50%

-13.69%

Volatility

SPM.MI vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison

Saipem SpA (SPM.MI) has a higher volatility of 10.02% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 6.57%. This indicates that SPM.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPM.MIGISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.02%

6.57%

+3.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.78%

19.38%

+5.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.62%

24.04%

+7.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.87%

21.97%

+47.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.69%

22.90%

+34.79%

Dividends

SPM.MI vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison

SPM.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than GIS's 7.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
7.07%5.20%3.73%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%
SPM.MI
Saipem SpA
3.60%7.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SPM.MI vs. GIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Saipem SpA and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. SPM.MI values in EUR, GIS values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


SPM.MI and GIS have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPM.MI and GIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer