SPIB vs. LQD
SPIB (SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF) and LQD (iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - SPIB tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Intermediate Corporate Bond Index while LQD tracks the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPIB returned 2.67%/yr vs 2.11%/yr for LQD. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SPIB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for LQD.
Performance
SPIB vs. LQD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPIB achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly higher than LQD's -1.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SPIB has outperformed LQD with an annualized return of 2.67%, while LQD has yielded a comparatively lower 2.11% annualized return.
SPIB
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 2.67%
- 3Y*
- 5.65%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- 2.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.75%
LQD
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- 6M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -1.39%
- 1Y
- 0.96%
- 3Y*
- 4.37%
- 5Y*
- -1.03%
- 10Y*
- 2.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.33B | $3.16B | $3.02B | |
| $212.75M | $189.00M | $234.31M |
SPIB vs. LQD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPIB SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF | 0.18% | 7.91% | 4.28% | 7.27% | -9.65% | -1.24% | 7.69% | 10.23% | -0.49% | 3.76% |
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | -1.39% | 7.90% | 0.86% | 9.40% | -17.92% | -1.84% | 10.97% | 17.37% | -3.79% | 7.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPIB and LQD is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2009 | 0.78 |
The correlation between SPIB and LQD shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.95 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPIB vs. LQD — Risk / Return Rank
SPIB
LQD
SPIB vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPIB | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.06 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 0.56 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.22 | 1.37 | +3.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPIB vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPIB drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum LQD drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIB and LQD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPIB | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.94% | -24.95% | +10.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.02% | -3.34% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.90% | -6.73% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.80% | -24.95% | +10.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.94% | -24.95% | +10.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -5.49% | +4.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | -3.99% | +2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | 1.36% | -0.71% |
Volatility
SPIB vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) is 0.76%, while iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) has a volatility of 1.37%. This indicates that SPIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPIB | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | 1.37% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.28% | 4.08% | -1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85% | 5.28% | -2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.48% | 8.64% | -4.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.60% | 8.69% | -4.09% |
SPIB vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPIB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPIB vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison
SPIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, less than LQD's 4.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.23% | 4.48% | 4.45% | 3.99% | 3.30% | 2.30% | 2.66% | 3.29% | 3.67% | 3.10% | 3.34% | 3.47% |
SPIB SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.12% | 4.42% | 4.41% | 3.84% | 2.65% | 1.58% | 2.18% | 3.03% | 3.04% | 2.79% | 2.68% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SPIB and LQD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LQD has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to SPIB (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPIB dropped -14.94% vs LQD's -24.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPIB leads with 2.67% vs 2.11% for LQD. On fees, SPIB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPIB has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPIB has performed better with a 2.67% return vs 2.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPIB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for LQD.
LQD has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 4.12% for SPIB.
SPIB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Intermediate Corporate Bond Index, while LQD tracks iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPIB and 0.15% for LQD.
SPIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPIB and LQD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer