SPIB vs. LQD
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD).
SPIB and LQD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPIB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Credit - Corporate - Investment Grade - Intermediate. It was launched on Feb 10, 2009. LQD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. It was launched on Jul 26, 2002. Both SPIB and LQD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPIB or LQD.
Correlation
The correlation between SPIB and LQD is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SPIB vs. LQD - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SPIB:
1.35
LQD:
0.32
SPIB:
1.97
LQD:
0.49
SPIB:
1.24
LQD:
1.06
SPIB:
0.82
LQD:
0.14
SPIB:
4.94
LQD:
0.88
SPIB:
0.99%
LQD:
2.57%
SPIB:
3.61%
LQD:
7.02%
SPIB:
-14.94%
LQD:
-24.95%
SPIB:
-1.63%
LQD:
-11.22%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPIB achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly higher than LQD's -0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SPIB has outperformed LQD with an annualized return of 2.43%, while LQD has yielded a comparatively lower 2.07% annualized return.
SPIB
0.03%
0.21%
2.17%
4.89%
1.40%
2.43%
LQD
-0.06%
-0.34%
0.66%
2.46%
-0.44%
2.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPIB vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPIB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPIB vs. LQD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SPIB
LQD
SPIB vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPIB vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison
SPIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, which matches LQD's 4.45% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPIB SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.41% | 4.41% | 3.83% | 2.65% | 1.58% | 2.18% | 3.04% | 3.04% | 2.79% | 2.91% | 2.70% | 2.65% |
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.45% | 4.45% | 3.99% | 3.30% | 2.30% | 2.66% | 3.29% | 3.67% | 3.10% | 3.34% | 3.47% | 3.39% |
Drawdowns
SPIB vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPIB drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum LQD drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIB and LQD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPIB vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) is 1.16%, while iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) has a volatility of 2.23%. This indicates that SPIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.