PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPIB vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPIB vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPIB achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SPIB has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 2.79%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.55% annualized return.


SPIB

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.37%
YTD
0.46%
6M
0.64%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
5.83%
5Y*
1.77%
10Y*
2.79%

BND

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.38%
6M
0.45%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
0.04%
10Y*
1.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPIB vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPIB
SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.46%7.91%4.28%7.27%-9.65%-1.24%7.69%10.23%-0.49%3.76%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.38%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SPIB and BND is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2009

0.78

The correlation between SPIB and BND shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.95 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPIB vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPIB
SPIB Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SPIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIB Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIB Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPIB vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPIBBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.21

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

1.64

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.83

4.69

+3.14

SPIB vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPIB Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPIB and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPIB vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIB drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIB and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPIBBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.94%

-18.58%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-2.68%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.18%

-5.92%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.80%

-17.91%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.94%

-18.58%

+3.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-2.26%

+1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.90%

-3.06%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

0.93%

-0.33%

Volatility

SPIB vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) is 0.91%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 1.08%. This indicates that SPIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPIBBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

1.08%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.19%

2.77%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86%

3.74%

-0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.48%

6.03%

-1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.60%

5.54%

-0.94%

SPIB vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPIB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPIB vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

SPIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than BND's 3.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.96%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
SPIB
SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.46%4.42%4.41%3.84%2.65%1.58%2.18%3.03%3.04%2.79%2.68%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SPIB and BND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BND has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to SPIB (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPIB dropped -14.94% vs BND's -18.58%.

On 10-year performance, SPIB leads with 2.79% vs 1.55% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPIB has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPIB has performed better with a 2.79% return vs 1.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SPIB.

SPIB has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 3.96% for BND.

SPIB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BND is Total Bond Market. SPIB tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Credit - Corporate - Investment Grade - Intermediate, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SPIB and 0.03% for BND.

SPIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPIB and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer