SPIB vs. SPLB
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) and SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB).
SPIB and SPLB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPIB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Credit - Corporate - Investment Grade - Intermediate. It was launched on Feb 10, 2009. SPLB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays Long U.S. Corporate Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 2009. Both SPIB and SPLB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPIB or SPLB.
Correlation
The correlation between SPIB and SPLB is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SPIB vs. SPLB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SPIB:
2.08
SPLB:
0.48
SPIB:
3.10
SPLB:
0.73
SPIB:
1.39
SPLB:
1.09
SPIB:
1.37
SPLB:
0.22
SPIB:
8.26
SPLB:
1.24
SPIB:
0.95%
SPLB:
4.49%
SPIB:
3.77%
SPLB:
11.50%
SPIB:
-14.94%
SPLB:
-34.46%
SPIB:
-0.24%
SPLB:
-19.85%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPIB achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly higher than SPLB's 1.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SPIB has outperformed SPLB with an annualized return of 2.57%, while SPLB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.96% annualized return.
SPIB
2.50%
0.65%
2.44%
8.16%
1.87%
2.57%
SPLB
1.31%
-0.10%
-0.99%
6.67%
-2.36%
1.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPIB vs. SPLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPIB and SPLB have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPIB vs. SPLB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SPIB
SPLB
SPIB vs. SPLB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) and SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPIB vs. SPLB - Dividend Comparison
SPIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, less than SPLB's 5.24% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPIB SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.44% | 4.41% | 3.84% | 2.65% | 1.58% | 2.18% | 3.03% | 3.03% | 2.79% | 2.68% | 2.69% | 2.65% |
SPLB SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.24% | 5.20% | 4.60% | 4.53% | 3.00% | 3.01% | 3.79% | 4.50% | 4.06% | 4.34% | 4.70% | 4.25% |
Drawdowns
SPIB vs. SPLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPIB drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum SPLB drawdown of -34.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIB and SPLB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPIB vs. SPLB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) is 1.97%, while SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that SPIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.