SPHQ vs. SCHG

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPHQ is a Quality Factor fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ returned 14.58%/yr vs 18.33%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SPHQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

SPHQ vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 14.14% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 7.11% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 14.58%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.33% annualized return.

SPHQ

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: -3.11%
• 6M: 8.93%
• YTD: 14.14%
• 1Y: 21.69%
• 3Y*: 19.92%
• 5Y*: 12.81%
• 10Y*: 14.58%
• ALL TIME*: 10.03%

SCHG

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: 2.17%
• 6M: 8.95%
• YTD: 7.11%
• 1Y: 18.50%
• 3Y*: 23.37%
• 5Y*: 13.47%
• 10Y*: 18.33%
• ALL TIME*: 16.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	$249.58M	$250.01M	$339.80M
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF	$121.34M	$134.31M	$144.70M

SPHQ vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF	14.14%	13.25%	25.44%	24.83%	-15.76%	28.03%	17.36%	33.64%	-7.10%	19.10%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	7.11%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHQ and SCHG is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009	0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between SPHQ and SCHG has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPHQ vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPHQ	SCHG
Technology	41.2%	44.0%
Industrials	17.7%	7.6%
Financial Services	15.2%	7.7%
Consumer Defensive	7.5%	1.9%
Communication Services	6.4%	14.1%
Consumer Cyclical	5.3%	11.2%
Utilities	4.5%	0.5%
Healthcare	3.2%	9.9%
Basic Materials	2.5%	1.6%
Energy	1.0%	0.9%
Real Estate	-	0.6%

Return for Risk

SPHQ vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPHQ

SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 65
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 69

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 39
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPHQ vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPHQ	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.12	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	1.59	+0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.20	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	1.13	+1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.64	3.58	+5.07

SPHQ vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHQ and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPHQ vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPHQ	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.83%	-34.59%	-23.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.90%	-16.41%	+7.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.57%	-23.39%	+6.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.04%	-34.59%	+9.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.60%	-34.59%	+2.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.50%	-1.15%	-4.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.64%	-5.19%	-5.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.52%	5.19%	-2.67%

Volatility

SPHQ vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 4.77% and 4.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPHQ	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.77%	4.76%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.37%	13.02%	-0.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.51%	16.66%	-2.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.74%	22.45%	-5.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.98%	21.60%	-3.62%

SPHQ vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPHQ vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF	1.10%	1.09%	1.15%	1.42%	1.85%	1.19%	1.55%	1.51%	1.85%	1.57%	1.67%	2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPHQ and SCHG in my portfolio?

SPHQ and SCHG have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPHQ or SCHG?

SPHQ has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to SCHG (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, SPHQ or SCHG?

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.33% vs 14.58% for SPHQ. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPHQ or SCHG?

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.33% return vs 14.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPHQ or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SPHQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPHQ or SCHG?

SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between SPHQ and SCHG?

SPHQ is categorized as Quality Factor, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.