SPHQ vs. QDEF
SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) and QDEF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund) are both Quality Factor funds - SPHQ tracks the S&P 500 Quality Index while QDEF tracks the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ returned 14.58%/yr vs 12.03%/yr for QDEF. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SPHQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for QDEF.
Performance
SPHQ vs. QDEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 14.14% return, which is significantly higher than QDEF's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ has outperformed QDEF with an annualized return of 14.58%, while QDEF has yielded a comparatively lower 12.03% annualized return.
SPHQ
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- 6M
- 8.93%
- YTD
- 14.14%
- 1Y
- 21.69%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 12.81%
- 10Y*
- 14.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.03%
QDEF
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 21.44%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.40%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $574.46K | $566.98K | $752.75K | |
| $121.34M | $134.31M | $144.70M |
SPHQ vs. QDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 14.14% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 10.91% | 17.43% | 21.19% | 17.48% | -10.94% | 26.04% | 3.15% | 24.90% | -4.10% | 17.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHQ and QDEF is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2012 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SPHQ and QDEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.89 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPHQ vs. QDEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPHQ
QDEF
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPHQ
QDEF
Industrials
SPHQ
QDEF
Financial Services
SPHQ
QDEF
Consumer Defensive
SPHQ
QDEF
Communication Services
SPHQ
QDEF
Consumer Cyclical
SPHQ
QDEF
Utilities
SPHQ
QDEF
Healthcare
SPHQ
QDEF
Basic Materials
SPHQ
QDEF
Energy
SPHQ
QDEF
Real Estate
SPHQ
-
QDEF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHQ vs. QDEF — Risk / Return Rank
SPHQ
QDEF
SPHQ vs. QDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPHQ | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.41 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 3.10 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.64 | 12.91 | -4.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPHQ vs. QDEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, which is greater than QDEF's maximum drawdown of -35.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and QDEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHQ | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.83% | -35.74% | -22.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -6.95% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.57% | -14.43% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.04% | -21.37% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | -35.74% | +4.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.50% | -0.19% | -5.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.64% | -3.27% | -7.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 1.66% | +0.86% |
Volatility
SPHQ vs. QDEF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) at 2.23%. This indicates that SPHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHQ | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 2.23% | +2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.37% | 7.47% | +4.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.51% | 9.84% | +4.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 13.77% | +2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 16.14% | +1.84% |
SPHQ vs. QDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QDEF's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPHQ vs. QDEF - Dividend Comparison
SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than QDEF's 1.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 1.57% | 1.74% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 2.42% | 1.84% | 2.50% | 3.17% | 7.10% | 2.70% | 2.90% | 3.00% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.10% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHQ and QDEF have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHQ has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to QDEF (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs QDEF's -35.74%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.58% vs 12.03% for QDEF. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QDEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.58% return vs 12.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDEF.
QDEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.10% for SPHQ.
SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index, while QDEF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 0.37% for QDEF.
QDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHQ and QDEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer