SPEM vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SPEM (SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets BMI, while FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPEM returned 9.63%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for FNDF. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPEM charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

SPEM vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPEM achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 19.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SPEM has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 9.63%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.34% annualized return.

SPEM

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: -0.21%
• YTD: 11.32%
• 6M: 13.11%
• 1Y: 25.79%
• 3Y*: 17.37%
• 5Y*: 5.60%
• 10Y*: 9.63%

FNDF

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 1.01%
• YTD: 19.66%
• 6M: 21.60%
• 1Y: 40.25%
• 3Y*: 22.69%
• 5Y*: 13.11%
• 10Y*: 12.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPEM vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF	11.32%	25.63%	11.40%	10.51%	-17.90%	1.51%	14.55%	19.69%	-13.26%	34.82%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	19.66%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	18.46%	-14.21%	23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SPEM and FNDF is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013	0.77

The correlation between SPEM and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPEM vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPEM	FNDF
Technology	28.2%	11.1%
Financial Services	20.2%	16.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	10.7%
Industrials	8.5%	15.9%
Basic Materials	8.2%	11.3%
Communication Services	7.2%	4.9%
Energy	4.7%	12.3%
Healthcare	4.0%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	6.9%
Utilities	2.8%	3.8%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.9%

Return for Risk

SPEM vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPEM

SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 52
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 54

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 85
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPEM vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPEM	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	2.53	-0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	3.30	-1.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.45	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	3.82	-1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.16	14.27	-6.11

SPEM vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPEM and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPEM vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPEM drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than FNDF's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEM and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPEM	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.41%	-40.14%	-24.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.36%	-10.60%	-0.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.62%	-13.89%	-3.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.75%	-25.56%	-6.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.06%	-40.14%	+4.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.40%	-1.94%	-0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.73%	-7.63%	-7.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	2.84%	+0.33%

Volatility

SPEM vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) have volatilities of 6.87% and 6.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPEM	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.87%	6.65%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.21%	13.64%	+0.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.67%	16.00%	+0.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.26%	16.35%	+0.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.83%	17.71%	+1.12%

SPEM vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPEM has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPEM vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

SPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than FNDF's 2.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	2.87%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF	2.49%	2.77%	2.78%	2.80%	3.38%	3.14%	1.92%	2.94%	2.34%	1.12%	1.51%	2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPEM and FNDF in my portfolio?

SPEM and FNDF have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPEM or FNDF?

SPEM has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to FNDF (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPEM dropped -64.41% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which ETF is better, SPEM or FNDF?

On 10-year performance, FNDF leads with 12.34% vs 9.63% for SPEM. On fees, SPEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, FNDF has been the lower-risk option at 6.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPEM or FNDF?

Over the 10-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPEM or FNDF?

SPEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPEM or FNDF?

FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 2.49% for SPEM.

What is the main difference between SPEM and FNDF?

SPEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SPEM tracks S&P Emerging Markets BMI, while FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SPEM and 0.25% for FNDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.