PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDW vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPDW vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDW achieves a 14.86% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 29.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SPDW has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 10.64%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.15% annualized return.


SPDW

1D
0.29%
1M
1.53%
YTD
14.86%
6M
16.65%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
19.01%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
10.64%

MTUM

1D
1.69%
1M
5.58%
YTD
29.72%
6M
30.51%
1Y
42.02%
3Y*
33.16%
5Y*
14.96%
10Y*
17.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDW vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
14.86%34.75%3.55%17.81%-15.98%11.45%9.90%22.41%-14.22%25.81%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
29.72%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDW and MTUM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.69

The correlation between SPDW and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPDW vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPDW
MTUM

Financial Services

22.9%
10.4%

Industrials

19.2%
15.6%

Technology

13.7%
44.4%

Healthcare

8.3%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
3.6%

Basic Materials

7.3%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
3.3%

Energy

5.5%
3.5%

Communication Services

3.8%
7.4%

Utilities

3.3%
1.6%

Real Estate

2.5%
1.8%

Financial Services

SPDW
22.9%
MTUM
10.4%

Industrials

SPDW
19.2%
MTUM
15.6%

Technology

SPDW
13.7%
MTUM
44.4%

Healthcare

SPDW
8.3%
MTUM
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPDW
7.8%
MTUM
3.6%

Basic Materials

SPDW
7.3%
MTUM
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

SPDW
5.7%
MTUM
3.3%

Energy

SPDW
5.5%
MTUM
3.5%

Communication Services

SPDW
3.8%
MTUM
7.4%

Utilities

SPDW
3.3%
MTUM
1.6%

Real Estate

SPDW
2.5%
MTUM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPDW vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDW
SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDW vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPDWMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.36

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

3.55

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.95

13.66

-3.70

SPDW vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDW Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDW and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPDW vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDW drawdown since its inception was -60.02%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDW and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDWMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.02%

-34.08%

-25.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-11.54%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.53%

-20.99%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.21%

-32.28%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

-34.08%

-0.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-1.55%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.89%

-6.20%

-6.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.99%

0.00%

Volatility

SPDW vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) is 6.86%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 10.89%. This indicates that SPDW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDWMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

10.89%

-4.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.23%

18.63%

-4.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.51%

20.87%

-4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

20.94%

-4.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.31%

21.20%

-3.89%

SPDW vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDW has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPDW vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

SPDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than MTUM's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.61%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
2.87%3.30%3.19%2.75%3.12%3.04%1.87%3.13%3.08%1.86%3.11%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPDW and MTUM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (10.89%) compared to SPDW (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDW dropped -60.02% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.15% vs 10.64% for SPDW. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPDW has been the lower-risk option at 6.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.15% return vs 10.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTUM.

SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 0.61% for MTUM.

SPDW is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPDW and 0.15% for MTUM.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPDW and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer