SPDW vs. IEFA
SPDW (SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF) and IEFA (iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - SPDW tracks the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index while IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPDW returned 10.06%/yr vs 9.37%/yr for IEFA. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPDW charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IEFA.
Performance
SPDW vs. IEFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPDW achieves a 12.18% return, which is significantly higher than IEFA's 7.49% return. Over the past 10 years, SPDW has outperformed IEFA with an annualized return of 10.06%, while IEFA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.37% annualized return.
SPDW
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 12.18%
- 6M
- 14.96%
- 1Y
- 27.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- 10.06%
IEFA
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 19.61%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
SPDW vs. IEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 12.18% | 34.75% | 3.55% | 17.81% | -15.98% | 11.45% | 9.90% | 22.41% | -14.22% | 25.81% |
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 7.49% | 32.08% | 3.26% | 17.95% | -15.24% | 11.63% | 8.18% | 22.64% | -14.14% | 26.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPDW and IEFA is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012 | 0.99 |
The correlation between SPDW and IEFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPDW vs. IEFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPDW
IEFA
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
SPDW
IEFA
Industrials
SPDW
IEFA
Technology
SPDW
IEFA
Healthcare
SPDW
IEFA
Consumer Cyclical
SPDW
IEFA
Basic Materials
SPDW
IEFA
Consumer Defensive
SPDW
IEFA
Energy
SPDW
IEFA
Communication Services
SPDW
IEFA
Utilities
SPDW
IEFA
Real Estate
SPDW
IEFA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPDW vs. IEFA — Risk / Return Rank
SPDW
IEFA
SPDW vs. IEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPDW | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.24 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 1.71 | +0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.42 | 6.52 | +2.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPDW | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.30 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.47 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.54 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.50 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
SPDW vs. IEFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPDW drawdown since its inception was -60.02%, which is greater than IEFA's maximum drawdown of -34.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDW and IEFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPDW | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.02% | -34.78% | -25.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.55% | -11.50% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.53% | -13.76% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.21% | -30.41% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.98% | -34.78% | -0.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.30% | -2.44% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.90% | -6.69% | -6.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 3.02% | -0.05% |
Volatility
SPDW vs. IEFA - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) at 4.54%. This indicates that SPDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPDW | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 4.54% | +1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.76% | 12.74% | +1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.09% | 15.22% | +0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 16.55% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 17.32% | -0.02% |
SPDW vs. IEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPDW has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IEFA's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPDW vs. IEFA - Dividend Comparison
SPDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than IEFA's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.30% | 3.55% | 3.47% | 3.20% | 2.70% | 3.32% | 1.90% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.57% | 2.96% | 2.63% |
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 2.94% | 3.30% | 3.19% | 2.75% | 3.12% | 3.04% | 1.87% | 3.13% | 3.08% | 1.86% | 3.11% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, SPDW and IEFA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPDW has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to IEFA (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDW dropped -60.02% vs IEFA's -34.78%.
On 10-year performance, SPDW leads with 10.06% vs 9.37% for IEFA. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IEFA has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPDW has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 9.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IEFA.
IEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 2.94% for SPDW.
SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index, while IEFA tracks MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPDW and 0.07% for IEFA.
SPDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPDW and IEFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer