PortfoliosLab logo
IEFA vs. IEMG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IEFA and IEMG is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

IEFA vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IEFA:

0.69

IEMG:

0.44

Sortino Ratio

IEFA:

1.12

IEMG:

0.77

Omega Ratio

IEFA:

1.15

IEMG:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

IEFA:

0.90

IEMG:

0.36

Martin Ratio

IEFA:

2.64

IEMG:

1.42

Ulcer Index

IEFA:

4.70%

IEMG:

5.88%

Daily Std Dev

IEFA:

17.58%

IEMG:

18.79%

Max Drawdown

IEFA:

-34.79%

IEMG:

-38.71%

Current Drawdown

IEFA:

0.00%

IEMG:

-7.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFA achieves a 17.00% return, which is significantly higher than IEMG's 9.96% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFA has outperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 5.89%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively lower 3.76% annualized return.


IEFA

YTD

17.00%

1M

9.12%

6M

15.68%

1Y

12.00%

3Y*

12.18%

5Y*

12.15%

10Y*

5.89%

IEMG

YTD

9.96%

1M

10.49%

6M

7.96%

1Y

8.14%

3Y*

7.21%

5Y*

8.17%

10Y*

3.76%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF

IEFA vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IEMG's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IEFA vs. IEMG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IEFA is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IEFA is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IEFA is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IEFA is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IEFA is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IEFA is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IEMG is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IEMG is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IEMG is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IEMG is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IEMG is 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IEMG is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IEFA vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current IEFA Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFA and IEMG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

IEFA vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

IEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than IEMG's 2.91% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
2.97%3.47%3.20%2.70%3.32%1.90%3.18%3.46%2.57%2.96%2.63%3.10%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.91%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%2.30%

Drawdowns

IEFA vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFA drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFA and IEMG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

IEFA vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) is 3.10%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that IEFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...