PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDV vs. UDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPDV vs. UDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDV achieves a 14.19% return, which is significantly lower than UDIV's 14.99% return.


SPDV

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.73%
YTD
14.19%
6M
14.91%
1Y
27.39%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*

UDIV

1D
-0.69%
1M
6.05%
YTD
14.99%
6M
14.91%
1Y
33.63%
3Y*
24.66%
5Y*
14.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDV vs. UDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
14.19%10.90%14.40%5.45%-2.27%29.54%-6.09%20.46%-6.59%3.65%
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
14.99%19.00%25.61%25.21%-15.00%19.66%5.54%24.60%-8.83%2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDV and UDIV is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2017

0.73

The correlation between SPDV and UDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPDV vs. UDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPDV
UDIV

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
8.7%

Energy

12.3%
3.7%

Technology

11.1%
39.0%

Healthcare

9.7%
7.4%

Financial Services

9.2%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

9.1%
5.7%

Real Estate

8.7%
3.7%

Industrials

7.8%
5.8%

Communication Services

7.8%
10.7%

Utilities

5.8%
3.0%

Basic Materials

5.1%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPDV
13.5%
UDIV
8.7%

Energy

SPDV
12.3%
UDIV
3.7%

Technology

SPDV
11.1%
UDIV
39.0%

Healthcare

SPDV
9.7%
UDIV
7.4%

Financial Services

SPDV
9.2%
UDIV
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

SPDV
9.1%
UDIV
5.7%

Real Estate

SPDV
8.7%
UDIV
3.7%

Industrials

SPDV
7.8%
UDIV
5.8%

Communication Services

SPDV
7.8%
UDIV
10.7%

Utilities

SPDV
5.8%
UDIV
3.0%

Basic Materials

SPDV
5.1%
UDIV
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPDV vs. UDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDV
SPDV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SPDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

UDIV
UDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
UDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
UDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDV vs. UDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPDVUDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.52

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.74

4.00

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.66

18.28

-4.62

SPDV vs. UDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the UDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDV and UDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPDVUDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.83

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.91

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.74

-0.29

Drawdowns

SPDV vs. UDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDV drawdown since its inception was -43.81%, which is greater than UDIV's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDV and UDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDVUDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.81%

-35.21%

-8.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.80%

-8.44%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.62%

-19.19%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.31%

-23.18%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.69%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-4.64%

-1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.84%

+0.17%

Volatility

SPDV vs. UDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) is 2.76%, while Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) has a volatility of 2.98%. This indicates that SPDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDVUDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

2.98%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

8.99%

-0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.18%

11.95%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

15.51%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

16.27%

+4.04%

SPDV vs. UDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than UDIV's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPDV vs. UDIV - Dividend Comparison

SPDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than UDIV's 1.40% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
3.31%3.85%3.54%3.95%3.73%3.08%3.90%3.54%3.63%0.28%0.00%
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
1.40%1.53%2.05%1.91%3.20%2.97%2.90%3.40%3.74%3.47%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPDV and UDIV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UDIV has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to SPDV (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDV dropped -43.81% vs UDIV's -35.21%.

On 5-year performance, UDIV leads with 14.04% vs 8.17% for SPDV. On fees, UDIV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SPDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UDIV has performed better with a 14.04% return vs 8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UDIV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for SPDV.

SPDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 1.40% for UDIV.

SPDV tracks S&P 500 Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while UDIV tracks Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SPDV and 0.06% for UDIV.

UDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPDV and UDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer