PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDV vs. FDVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPDV vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDV achieves a 19.29% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's 12.19% return.


SPDV

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.78%
6M
13.02%
YTD
19.29%
1Y
30.26%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.72%

FDVV

1D
-0.35%
1M
2.09%
6M
9.39%
YTD
12.19%
1Y
21.53%
3Y*
18.35%
5Y*
14.17%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$48.25M$48.28M$45.73M
$807.83K$592.31K$401.15K

SPDV vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
19.29%10.90%14.40%5.45%-2.27%29.54%-6.09%20.46%-6.59%4.64%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
12.19%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%2.80%24.07%-1.26%3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDV and FDVV is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2017

0.86

The correlation between SPDV and FDVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPDV vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPDV
FDVV

Consumer Cyclical

14.9%
13.4%

Technology

12.1%
28.1%

Real Estate

10.6%
10.0%

Healthcare

10.4%
3.3%

Financial Services

10.2%
18.5%

Energy

8.8%

-

Industrials

8.4%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
11.0%

Communication Services

7.1%
3.4%

Utilities

5.7%
9.1%

Basic Materials

4.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPDV
14.9%
FDVV
13.4%

Technology

SPDV
12.1%
FDVV
28.1%

Real Estate

SPDV
10.6%
FDVV
10.0%

Healthcare

SPDV
10.4%
FDVV
3.3%

Financial Services

SPDV
10.2%
FDVV
18.5%

Energy

SPDV
8.8%
FDVV

-

Industrials

SPDV
8.4%
FDVV
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

SPDV
7.8%
FDVV
11.0%

Communication Services

SPDV
7.1%
FDVV
3.4%

Utilities

SPDV
5.7%
FDVV
9.1%

Basic Materials

SPDV
4.1%
FDVV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPDV vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPDV
SPDV Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SPDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDV Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPDV vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPDVFDVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.36

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

2.21

+2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.07

9.10

+5.97

SPDV vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDV and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPDV vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDV drawdown since its inception was -43.81%, which is greater than FDVV's maximum drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDV and FDVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDVFDVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.81%

-40.25%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.80%

-9.30%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.62%

-15.90%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.31%

-20.18%

-1.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-1.12%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.46%

-3.76%

-2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.26%

-0.34%

Volatility

SPDV vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 3.04%. This indicates that SPDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDVFDVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

3.04%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.34%

8.35%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

10.37%

+1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

14.68%

+1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.20%

16.91%

+3.29%

SPDV vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPDV and FDVV have an expense ratio of 0.29%.


Dividends

SPDV vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

SPDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than FDVV's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
2.76%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
3.23%3.85%3.54%3.95%3.73%3.08%3.90%3.54%3.63%0.28%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPDV and FDVV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPDV has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to FDVV (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDV dropped -43.81% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 14.17% vs 10.42% for SPDV. Both ETFs have the same 0.29% expense ratio. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 14.17% return vs 10.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDV and FDVV have the same expense ratio: 0.29% per year.

SPDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 2.76% for FDVV.

SPDV is categorized as Dividend, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. SPDV tracks S&P 500 Dividend & Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and Fidelity.

SPDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPDV and FDVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer