SPDV vs. FDVV
SPDV (AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPDV is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPDV returned 8.17%/yr vs 13.36%/yr for FDVV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.29% expense ratio.
Performance
SPDV vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPDV achieves a 14.19% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's 8.39% return.
SPDV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- YTD
- 14.19%
- 6M
- 14.91%
- 1Y
- 27.39%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- —
FDVV
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 8.39%
- 6M
- 8.67%
- 1Y
- 23.45%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.36%
- 10Y*
- —
SPDV vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDV AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF | 14.19% | 10.90% | 14.40% | 5.45% | -2.27% | 29.54% | -6.09% | 20.46% | -6.59% | 3.65% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 8.39% | 17.08% | 21.81% | 18.00% | -4.21% | 29.24% | 2.80% | 24.07% | -1.26% | 2.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPDV and FDVV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2017 | 0.86 |
The correlation between SPDV and FDVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPDV vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPDV
FDVV
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Industrials
Communication Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPDV
FDVV
Energy
SPDV
FDVV
-
Technology
SPDV
FDVV
Healthcare
SPDV
FDVV
Financial Services
SPDV
FDVV
Consumer Defensive
SPDV
FDVV
Real Estate
SPDV
FDVV
Industrials
SPDV
FDVV
Communication Services
SPDV
FDVV
Utilities
SPDV
FDVV
Basic Materials
SPDV
FDVV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPDV vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank
SPDV
FDVV
SPDV vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPDV | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.26 | 2.35 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.35 | 3.28 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.43 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.74 | 2.53 | +2.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.66 | 10.54 | +3.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPDV | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 2.35 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.91 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.79 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
SPDV vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPDV drawdown since its inception was -43.81%, which is greater than FDVV's maximum drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDV and FDVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPDV | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.81% | -40.25% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.80% | -9.30% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.62% | -15.90% | -2.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.31% | -20.18% | -1.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -1.12% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -3.81% | -2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 2.23% | -0.22% |
Volatility
SPDV vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) is 2.76%, while Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that SPDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPDV | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.76% | 3.14% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 7.99% | +0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.18% | 10.06% | +2.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 14.75% | +1.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 17.00% | +3.31% |
SPDV vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPDV and FDVV have an expense ratio of 0.29%.
Dividends
SPDV vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison
SPDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than FDVV's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.72% | 2.89% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 3.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 3.66% | 1.04% |
SPDV AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF | 3.31% | 3.85% | 3.54% | 3.95% | 3.73% | 3.08% | 3.90% | 3.54% | 3.63% | 0.28% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPDV and FDVV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDVV has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to SPDV (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDV dropped -43.81% vs FDVV's -40.25%.
On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.36% vs 8.17% for SPDV. Both ETFs have the same 0.29% expense ratio. On volatility, SPDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDV and FDVV have the same expense ratio: 0.29% per year.
SPDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 2.72% for FDVV.
SPDV is categorized as Dividend, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. SPDV tracks S&P 500 Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and Fidelity.
FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPDV and FDVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer