PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDV vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPDV vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDV achieves a 14.44% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 12.82% return.


SPDV

1D
1.06%
1M
0.33%
YTD
14.44%
6M
13.65%
1Y
26.76%
3Y*
16.31%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*

FDL

1D
0.46%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
12.82%
6M
12.61%
1Y
23.52%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
13.04%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDV vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
14.44%10.90%14.40%5.45%-2.27%29.54%-6.09%20.46%-6.59%4.64%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
12.82%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDV and FDL is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2017

0.87

The correlation between SPDV and FDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPDV vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPDV
FDL

Consumer Cyclical

14.5%
4.7%

Technology

14.0%
1.4%

Healthcare

9.8%
17.6%

Real Estate

9.5%

-

Financial Services

9.1%
15.2%

Consumer Defensive

9.0%
14.4%

Energy

8.9%
25.7%

Industrials

7.8%
3.9%

Communication Services

7.4%
10.6%

Utilities

5.3%
6.5%

Basic Materials

4.6%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SPDV
14.5%
FDL
4.7%

Technology

SPDV
14.0%
FDL
1.4%

Healthcare

SPDV
9.8%
FDL
17.6%

Real Estate

SPDV
9.5%
FDL

-

Financial Services

SPDV
9.1%
FDL
15.2%

Consumer Defensive

SPDV
9.0%
FDL
14.4%

Energy

SPDV
8.9%
FDL
25.7%

Industrials

SPDV
7.8%
FDL
3.9%

Communication Services

SPDV
7.4%
FDL
10.6%

Utilities

SPDV
5.3%
FDL
6.5%

Basic Materials

SPDV
4.6%
FDL
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPDV vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDV
SPDV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SPDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDV vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPDVFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.36

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.64

5.53

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.09

12.87

+0.22

SPDV vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDV and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPDV vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDV drawdown since its inception was -43.81%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDV and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDVFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.81%

-65.93%

+22.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.80%

-4.27%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.62%

-12.24%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.31%

-16.46%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-2.96%

+1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.53%

-9.63%

+3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.83%

+0.22%

Volatility

SPDV vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) have volatilities of 3.32% and 3.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDVFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

3.39%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.38%

8.09%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.34%

11.55%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.25%

14.31%

+1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.27%

17.10%

+3.17%

SPDV vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPDV vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

SPDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than FDL's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
4.69%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
3.31%3.85%3.54%3.95%3.73%3.08%3.90%3.54%3.63%0.28%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPDV and FDL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to SPDV (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDV dropped -43.81% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 5-year performance, FDL leads with 13.04% vs 9.04% for SPDV. On fees, SPDV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDL has performed better with a 13.04% return vs 9.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FDL.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 3.31% for SPDV.

SPDV is categorized as Dividend, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. SPDV tracks S&P 500 Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SPDV and 0.43% for FDL.

SPDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPDV and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer