SPDG vs. UDIV
SPDG (SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF) and UDIV (Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both Dividend funds - SPDG tracks the S&P Sector-Neutral High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index while UDIV tracks the Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPDG returned 28.62% vs 33.63% for UDIV. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPDG charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for UDIV.
Performance
SPDG vs. UDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPDG achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than UDIV's 14.99% return.
SPDG
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 7.25%
- YTD
- 16.69%
- 6M
- 16.41%
- 1Y
- 28.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UDIV
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 6.05%
- YTD
- 14.99%
- 6M
- 14.91%
- 1Y
- 33.63%
- 3Y*
- 24.66%
- 5Y*
- 14.04%
- 10Y*
- —
SPDG vs. UDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDG SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF | 16.69% | 11.66% | 20.22% | 8.14% |
UDIV Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 14.99% | 19.00% | 25.61% | 7.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPDG and UDIV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023 | 0.80 |
The correlation between SPDG and UDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPDG vs. UDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPDG
UDIV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPDG
UDIV
Financial Services
SPDG
UDIV
Communication Services
SPDG
UDIV
Consumer Cyclical
SPDG
UDIV
Healthcare
SPDG
UDIV
Industrials
SPDG
UDIV
Consumer Defensive
SPDG
UDIV
Energy
SPDG
UDIV
Utilities
SPDG
UDIV
Real Estate
SPDG
UDIV
Basic Materials
SPDG
UDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPDG vs. UDIV — Risk / Return Rank
SPDG
UDIV
SPDG vs. UDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) and Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPDG | UDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.52 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | 4.00 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.57 | 18.28 | -6.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPDG | UDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 2.83 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | 0.74 | +0.77 |
Drawdowns
SPDG vs. UDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPDG drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, smaller than the maximum UDIV drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDG and UDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPDG | UDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.67% | -35.21% | +19.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -8.44% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -0.69% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.19% | -4.64% | +2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 1.84% | +0.64% |
Volatility
SPDG vs. UDIV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) at 2.98%. This indicates that SPDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPDG | UDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 2.98% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.23% | 8.99% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.14% | 11.95% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.18% | 15.51% | -1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.18% | 16.27% | -2.09% |
SPDG vs. UDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPDG has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than UDIV's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPDG vs. UDIV - Dividend Comparison
SPDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than UDIV's 1.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDG SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF | 2.59% | 2.87% | 2.61% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UDIV Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 1.40% | 1.53% | 2.05% | 1.91% | 3.20% | 2.97% | 2.90% | 3.40% | 3.74% | 3.47% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPDG and UDIV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPDG has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to UDIV (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDG dropped -15.67% vs UDIV's -35.21%.
On 1-year performance, UDIV leads with 33.63% vs 28.62% for SPDG. On fees, SPDG is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, UDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UDIV has performed better with a 33.63% return vs 28.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDG is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for UDIV.
SPDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.40% for UDIV.
SPDG tracks S&P Sector-Neutral High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while UDIV tracks Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPDG and 0.06% for UDIV.
UDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPDG and UDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer