SPDG vs. UDIV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SPDG (SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF) and UDIV (Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both Dividend funds - SPDG tracks the S&P Sector-Neutral High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index while UDIV tracks the Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPDG returned 24.68% vs 28.77% for UDIV. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPDG charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for UDIV.

Performance

SPDG vs. UDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) and Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDG achieves a 14.47% return, which is significantly higher than UDIV's 12.46% return.

SPDG

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: -0.52%
• YTD: 14.47%
• 6M: 13.49%
• 1Y: 24.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UDIV

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: 12.46%
• 6M: 11.52%
• 1Y: 28.77%
• 3Y*: 23.16%
• 5Y*: 13.95%
• 10Y*: 11.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDG vs. UDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SPDG SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF	14.47%	11.66%	20.22%	8.09%
UDIV Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF	12.46%	19.00%	25.61%	7.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDG and UDIV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2023	0.80

The correlation between SPDG and UDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPDG vs. UDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPDG	UDIV
Technology	37.4%	40.3%
Financial Services	11.8%	11.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	8.7%
Healthcare	9.0%	7.1%
Communication Services	8.8%	10.2%
Industrials	8.8%	5.9%
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	5.4%
Energy	3.8%	3.3%
Utilities	2.4%	3.1%
Real Estate	2.2%	3.6%
Basic Materials	1.6%	0.8%

Return for Risk

SPDG vs. UDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDG

SPDG Risk / Return Rank: 63
SPDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
SPDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
SPDG Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SPDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
SPDG Martin Ratio Rank: 59

UDIV

UDIV Risk / Return Rank: 75
UDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
UDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
UDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 75
UDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
UDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDG vs. UDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) and Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPDG	UDIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	2.30	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	3.08	-0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.42	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	3.42	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.82	15.00	-5.18

SPDG vs. UDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDG Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the UDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDG and UDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPDG vs. UDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDG drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, smaller than the maximum UDIV drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDG and UDIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPDG	UDIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.67%	-35.21%	+19.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.34%	-8.44%	+0.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.19%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.18%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.56%	-2.88%	+0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.19%	-4.63%	+2.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.52%	1.92%	+0.60%

Volatility

SPDG vs. UDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) is 4.69%, while Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that SPDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPDG	UDIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.69%	4.96%	-0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.65%	9.91%	-0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.43%	12.60%	-0.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.21%	15.62%	-1.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.21%	16.30%	-2.09%

SPDG vs. UDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDG has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than UDIV's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPDG vs. UDIV - Dividend Comparison

SPDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than UDIV's 1.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
SPDG SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF	2.72%	2.87%	2.61%	0.90%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UDIV Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF	1.12%	1.53%	2.05%	1.91%	3.20%	2.97%	2.90%	3.40%	3.74%	3.47%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPDG and UDIV in my portfolio?

SPDG and UDIV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPDG or UDIV?

UDIV has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to SPDG (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDG dropped -15.67% vs UDIV's -35.21%.

Which ETF is better, SPDG or UDIV?

On 1-year performance, UDIV leads with 28.77% vs 24.68% for SPDG. On fees, SPDG is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPDG has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPDG or UDIV?

Over the 1-year period, UDIV has performed better with a 28.77% return vs 24.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPDG or UDIV?

SPDG is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for UDIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPDG or UDIV?

SPDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 1.12% for UDIV.

What is the main difference between SPDG and UDIV?

SPDG tracks S&P Sector-Neutral High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while UDIV tracks Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPDG and 0.06% for UDIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.