PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDG vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPDG vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDG achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.42% return.


SPDG

1D
-0.67%
1M
7.25%
YTD
16.69%
6M
16.41%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHG

1D
-1.23%
1M
4.81%
YTD
6.42%
6M
5.81%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
25.02%
5Y*
15.59%
10Y*
18.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDG vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPDG
SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF
16.69%11.66%20.22%8.14%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
6.42%17.50%34.95%9.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDG and SCHG is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023

0.56

The correlation between SPDG and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPDG vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPDG
SCHG

Technology

35.5%
46.3%

Financial Services

12.9%
6.7%

Communication Services

10.5%
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
12.7%

Healthcare

9.1%
7.7%

Industrials

8.5%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
1.7%

Energy

3.3%
0.8%

Utilities

2.4%
0.4%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.5%

Basic Materials

1.4%
1.4%

Technology

SPDG
35.5%
SCHG
46.3%

Financial Services

SPDG
12.9%
SCHG
6.7%

Communication Services

SPDG
10.5%
SCHG
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SPDG
9.5%
SCHG
12.7%

Healthcare

SPDG
9.1%
SCHG
7.7%

Industrials

SPDG
8.5%
SCHG
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPDG
4.7%
SCHG
1.7%

Energy

SPDG
3.3%
SCHG
0.8%

Utilities

SPDG
2.4%
SCHG
0.4%

Real Estate

SPDG
2.2%
SCHG
0.5%

Basic Materials

SPDG
1.4%
SCHG
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPDG vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDG
SPDG Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDG Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDG Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDG vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPDGSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.28

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

1.51

+1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.57

5.04

+6.52

SPDG vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDG Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDG and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPDGSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

1.60

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.52

0.84

+0.67

Drawdowns

SPDG vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDG drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDG and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDGSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.67%

-34.59%

+18.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-16.41%

+8.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-1.78%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.19%

-5.20%

+3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

4.90%

-2.42%

Volatility

SPDG vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 3.54% and 3.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDGSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

3.61%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

11.62%

-2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

15.50%

-3.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.18%

22.27%

-8.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.18%

21.55%

-7.37%

SPDG vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDG has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPDG vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SPDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
SPDG
SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF
2.59%2.87%2.61%0.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPDG and SCHG have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to SPDG (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDG dropped -15.67% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 1-year performance, SPDG leads with 28.62% vs 24.64% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPDG has performed better with a 28.62% return vs 24.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SPDG.

SPDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.

SPDG is categorized as Dividend, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPDG tracks S&P Sector-Neutral High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPDG and 0.04% for SCHG.

SPDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPDG and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer