SPAM vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SPAM (Themes Cybersecurity ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPAM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Cyber Security Index - Benchmark TR Net, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. SPAM is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, SPAM returned 31.98% vs 299.04% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. SPAM charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

SPAM vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPAM achieves a 38.17% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -27.52% return.

SPAM

• 1D: -1.93%
• 1M: 9.98%
• 6M: 33.89%
• YTD: 38.17%
• 1Y: 31.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: 6.51%
• 1M: 38.88%
• 6M: -2.59%
• YTD: -27.52%
• 1Y: 299.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPAM vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SPAM Themes Cybersecurity ETF	38.17%	4.86%	4.08%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-27.52%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SPAM and MSTZ is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.40

Return for Risk

SPAM vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPAM

SPAM Risk / Return Rank: 34
SPAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
SPAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
SPAM Omega Ratio Rank: 36
SPAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
SPAM Martin Ratio Rank: 27

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 70
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPAM vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPAM	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	2.03	-0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	2.49	-0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.33	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	3.55	-2.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.94	6.84	-3.90

SPAM vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPAM and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPAM vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPAM drawdown since its inception was -24.02%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPAM and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPAM	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.02%	-99.38%	+75.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.02%	-84.89%	+60.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.94%	-97.53%	+93.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.50%	-94.55%	+88.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.89%	43.95%	-33.06%

Volatility

SPAM vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) is 9.32%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 55.03%. This indicates that SPAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPAM	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.32%	55.03%	-45.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.22%	134.45%	-110.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.26%	148.58%	-120.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.09%	170.73%	-145.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.09%	170.73%	-145.64%

SPAM vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPAM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPAM vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

SPAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPAM Themes Cybersecurity ETF	0.35%	0.49%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPAM and MSTZ in my portfolio?

SPAM and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPAM or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (55.03%) compared to SPAM (9.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPAM dropped -24.02% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, SPAM or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 299.04% vs 31.98% for SPAM. On fees, SPAM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SPAM has been the lower-risk option at 9.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPAM or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 299.04% return vs 31.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPAM or MSTZ?

SPAM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPAM or MSTZ?

SPAM has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between SPAM and MSTZ?

SPAM is categorized as Technology Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Themes and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SPAM and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.