SOYB vs. RSMV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SOYB (Teucrium Soybean Fund) and RSMV (Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOYB is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Soybean Fund Benchmark, while RSMV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Teucrium. SOYB is passively managed, while RSMV is actively managed. Over the past year, SOYB returned 14.47% vs 25.46% for RSMV. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOYB charges 1.88%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for RSMV.

Performance

SOYB vs. RSMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) and Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOYB achieves a 12.90% return, which is significantly higher than RSMV's 8.93% return.

SOYB

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: -2.14%
• YTD: 12.90%
• 6M: 6.01%
• 1Y: 14.47%
• 3Y*: -0.07%
• 5Y*: 0.26%
• 10Y*: 1.86%

RSMV

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 7.76%
• YTD: 8.93%
• 6M: 9.49%
• 1Y: 25.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOYB vs. RSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SOYB Teucrium Soybean Fund	12.90%	-1.13%
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF	8.93%	11.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SOYB and RSMV is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

SOYB vs. RSMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOYB

SOYB Risk / Return Rank: 30
SOYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
SOYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
SOYB Omega Ratio Rank: 29
SOYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
SOYB Martin Ratio Rank: 28

RSMV

RSMV Risk / Return Rank: 68
RSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
RSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
RSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 63
RSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
RSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOYB vs. RSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) and Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SOYB	RSMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	2.14	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	2.99	-1.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.38	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	3.52	-1.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.06	13.44	-9.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SOYB vs. RSMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOYB Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the RSMV Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOYB and RSMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SOYB	RSMV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.11	2.14	-1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	1.02	-1.02

Drawdowns

SOYB vs. RSMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOYB drawdown since its inception was -53.76%, which is greater than RSMV's maximum drawdown of -17.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOYB and RSMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOYB	RSMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.76%	-17.58%	-36.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.78%	-7.27%	-1.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.80%	-0.83%	-14.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.76%	-3.97%	-21.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.57%	1.90%	+1.67%

Volatility

SOYB vs. RSMV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) is 4.05%, while Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that SOYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SOYB	RSMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	4.52%	-0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.94%	9.67%	-0.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.06%	11.94%	+1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.00%	14.54%	+3.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.98%	14.54%	+2.44%

SOYB vs. RSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOYB has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than RSMV's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SOYB vs. RSMV - Dividend Comparison

SOYB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.

Position	TTM	2025
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF	0.92%	1.00%
SOYB Teucrium Soybean Fund	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOYB and RSMV in my portfolio?

SOYB and RSMV have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SOYB or RSMV?

RSMV has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to SOYB (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOYB dropped -53.76% vs RSMV's -17.58%.

Which ETF is better, SOYB or RSMV?

On 1-year performance, RSMV leads with 25.46% vs 14.47% for SOYB. On fees, RSMV is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SOYB has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SOYB or RSMV?

Over the 1-year period, RSMV has performed better with a 25.46% return vs 14.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SOYB or RSMV?

RSMV is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.88% for SOYB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SOYB or RSMV?

RSMV has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.00% for SOYB.

What is the main difference between SOYB and RSMV?

SOYB is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while RSMV is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.88% for SOYB and 0.95% for RSMV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.