PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSMV vs. XXRP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSMV vs. XXRP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) and Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF (XXRP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSMV achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly higher than XXRP's -71.31% return.


RSMV

1D
0.25%
1M
6.55%
YTD
9.21%
6M
9.78%
1Y
25.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XXRP

1D
-5.54%
1M
-33.90%
YTD
-71.31%
6M
-79.17%
1Y
-90.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSMV vs. XXRP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RSMV and XXRP is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2025

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSMV vs. XXRP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSMV
RSMV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
RSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

XXRP
XXRP Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
XXRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXRP Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
XXRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXRP Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSMV vs. XXRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) and Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF (XXRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSMVXXRPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.87

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

-0.94

+4.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.47

-1.26

+14.73

RSMV vs. XXRP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSMV Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the XXRP Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSMV and XXRP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSMVXXRPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

-0.60

+2.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

-0.57

+1.61

Drawdowns

RSMV vs. XXRP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSMV drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, smaller than the maximum XXRP drawdown of -95.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSMV and XXRP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSMVXXRPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.58%

-95.46%

+77.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.27%

-95.46%

+88.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-95.46%

+94.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-59.75%

+55.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

71.46%

-69.56%

Volatility

RSMV vs. XXRP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) is 4.39%, while Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF (XXRP) has a volatility of 27.68%. This indicates that RSMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XXRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSMVXXRPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

27.68%

-23.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

104.81%

-95.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.94%

149.61%

-137.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.52%

145.96%

-131.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.52%

145.96%

-131.44%

RSMV vs. XXRP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSMV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than XXRP's 1.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSMV vs. XXRP - Dividend Comparison

RSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than XXRP's 22.76% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


RSMV and XXRP have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XXRP has higher volatility (27.68%) compared to RSMV (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSMV dropped -17.58% vs XXRP's -95.46%.

On 1-year performance, RSMV leads with 25.51% vs -90.01% for XXRP. On fees, RSMV is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, RSMV has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSMV has performed better with a 25.51% return vs -90.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSMV is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.89% for XXRP.

XXRP has the higher dividend yield at 22.76%, compared with 0.92% for RSMV.

RSMV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XXRP is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RSMV and 1.89% for XXRP.

RSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSMV and XXRP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer