SOCL vs. PFM
SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and PFM (Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - SOCL tracks the Solactive Social Media Index while PFM tracks the NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOCL returned 7.96%/yr vs 11.75%/yr for PFM. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for PFM.
Performance
SOCL vs. PFM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -23.22% return, which is significantly lower than PFM's 7.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SOCL has underperformed PFM with an annualized return of 7.96%, while PFM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.75% annualized return.
SOCL
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- -23.22%
- 6M
- -22.97%
- 1Y
- -20.93%
- 3Y*
- 5.38%
- 5Y*
- -9.67%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
PFM
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 7.31%
- 6M
- 6.16%
- 1Y
- 16.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
SOCL vs. PFM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | -23.22% | 31.04% | 5.08% | 31.08% | -42.23% | -12.84% | 78.35% | 25.74% | -16.39% | 54.65% |
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 7.31% | 14.00% | 16.87% | 11.40% | -6.22% | 23.08% | 9.53% | 26.88% | -4.58% | 17.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOCL and PFM is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2011 | 0.50 |
The correlation between SOCL and PFM shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SOCL vs. PFM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOCL
PFM
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
SOCL
PFM
Technology
SOCL
PFM
Consumer Defensive
SOCL
PFM
Industrials
SOCL
PFM
Consumer Cyclical
SOCL
PFM
Basic Materials
SOCL
-
PFM
Energy
SOCL
-
PFM
Financial Services
SOCL
-
PFM
Healthcare
SOCL
-
PFM
Real Estate
SOCL
-
PFM
Utilities
SOCL
-
PFM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOCL vs. PFM — Risk / Return Rank
SOCL
PFM
SOCL vs. PFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOCL | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.32 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 2.37 | -3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 9.58 | -10.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOCL vs. PFM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, which is greater than PFM's maximum drawdown of -53.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and PFM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOCL | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -53.21% | -15.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.52% | -7.09% | -26.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.52% | -14.50% | -19.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.32% | -17.81% | -48.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.70% | -32.22% | -36.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.84% | -1.12% | -43.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.03% | -6.93% | -15.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.95% | 1.75% | +15.20% |
Volatility
SOCL vs. PFM - Volatility Comparison
Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) at 2.35%. This indicates that SOCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOCL | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 2.35% | +7.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.15% | 7.19% | +11.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.03% | 9.49% | +14.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.84% | 13.51% | +16.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.60% | 15.20% | +12.40% |
SOCL vs. PFM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PFM's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOCL vs. PFM - Dividend Comparison
SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than PFM's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.58% | 1.86% | 1.95% | 1.69% | 1.92% | 1.94% | 2.27% | 1.70% | 2.56% | 2.36% |
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.61% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOCL and PFM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOCL has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to PFM (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs PFM's -53.21%.
On 10-year performance, PFM leads with 11.75% vs 7.96% for SOCL. On fees, PFM is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, PFM has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PFM has performed better with a 11.75% return vs 7.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFM is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SOCL.
PFM has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.56% for SOCL.
SOCL tracks Solactive Social Media Index, while PFM tracks NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 0.53% for PFM.
PFM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOCL and PFM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer